Development of a Partnering Maturity Assessment Tool for Transportation Agencies

Nunez, Milagros Pinto; Puerto, Carla López del; Jeong, Hae‐Kwon

doi:10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000272

Cited by 5 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Pinto Nunez et al (2018) [24] stated that partnering needs to be measured in order to assess program performance, determine benefits and costs, help in decision making, and the future planning of partner programs [24]. In addition, the process assists in identifying areas that need improvement, thereby increasing partnering processes in the future [24,26]. Tools and techniques for partnering can support the aims of all project participants, creating a more cooperative and effective team [27,28].…”

Section: Partneringmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hosseini et al (2016) [29] showed that one obstacle to implementing partnering in the construction industry is a lack of understanding of effective practices. The successful implementation of partnering requires understanding the practices and characteristics of the project [13,24,30]. Furthermore, measuring partnering performance includes continuous evaluation throughout the project, which includes assessing specific targets, correct milestones, and available resources [31].…”

Section: Partneringmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Pinto [24] also signified the importance of major elements in partnering, such as commitment, trust, respect, communication, and fairness. According to Sari (2022), [13] achieving mature partnering and TARIF values (Trust, Accountability, Responsiveness, Independence, and Fairness) requires good governance in an organization.…”

Section: Maturity Partnering Techniquementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Detecting problems early offers decision makers more options for resolving issues, which tends to reduce project costs and strengthen partnering relationships among stakeholders [18]. Pinto [24] further explained that maturity partnering is divided into four levels, each requiring metric guidance for deeper measurements.…”

Section: Maturity Partnering Techniquementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Previous research has not fully discussed the ways in which partnering can be applied in construction projects to produce value for each stakeholder. Meanwhile, previous findings only focused on partnering factors [15,16], levels [12,13,[17][18][19][20], interactions [13,21], challenges [13], waste reduction, and financial risk reduction [22][23][24][25]. Therefore, this research aims to improve our understanding of the way partnering is implemented in projects, considering depth as an indicator of success.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Tools and Techniques for Improving Maturity Partnering in Indonesian Construction Projects

Thohirin,

Wibowo,

Mohamad

et al. 2024

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The construction industry is naturally complex and constantly changing, with various factors impacting project results. Among the different methods developed to navigate this complexity, partnering is believed to increase project value and performance. Therefore, this research aimed at analyzing and formulating elements as well as indicators at each phase of a partnership-based project life cycle, serving as tools and techniques for measuring the depth of partnering in construction projects. The methodology used included both qualitative and quantitative methods (mixed method). In the qualitative method, the literature from relevant journals, books, and previous research was reviewed. This process was followed by an expert assessment through a Focus Group Discussion (FGD) to define elements and indicators for measuring the depth of partnering in construction projects. Meanwhile, the quantitative method comprised analyzing secondary project data to compare projects with in-depth partnering in order to deliver better value. The result of this research was the development of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to measure maturity partnering in partnership-based projects. Typically, the tools were adjusted to different phases of the project life cycle, starting from project initiation, comprising all stakeholders. Consequently, the outcome of this research could be used by organizations in the construction industry to develop partnering in partnership projects in Indonesia.

show abstract