Abstract:Bovine herpesvirus type 1 (BoHV-1) is recognized as an important pathogen causing respiratory, reproductive, and neurological disorders in cattle and is associated with economic losses to animal industry. Accurate diagnostic methods are needed for prevention of disease transmission. While the virus neutralization test is considered the gold standard method, it requires maintenance of the virus and cell cultures, which is time consuming and expensive. Serological techniques such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent a… Show more
“…Namely, these issues could be the determination of the presence, nature of platelet-reactive antibodies in patients' sera, and also the correlation rate of the first two tests with MAIPA assay. The present study is the first screening comparison of SB and FC for PR detection, but in the previous limited researches, SB was considered a relatively streamlined, sensitive, easily adaptable and applicable assay for detection of plasmodium-infected mosquito specimens, type I Glanzmann thrombasthenia and bovine herpesvirus type 1 [21,22,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the analysis conducted using this method is subjective and needs skilled personnel and expensive instrumentation. Another used method, slot blotting (SB), is a molecular technique applied to detect proteins/biomolecules and represents a simplification of the Western blot method with the advantages of rapidity, low cost, simplicity and availability that allows multiple samples to be evaluated simultaneously [21,22]. In this method, the sample is loaded directly on a nitrocellulose membrane, and the blotting procedure is performed.…”
Background and Objectives
Frequent platelet transfusion may lead to the formation of alloantibodies and immune‐mediated platelet destruction. Currently, identifying economic and effective screening methods is necessary for the management of platelet transfusion while different tests were recommended. The present study aims to challenge the performance of slot blotting (SB) and flow cytometry (FC) assays in detecting immune platelet refractoriness.
Materials and Methods
Sera from 118 patients who received blood components and were clinically suspected of platelet refractoriness were enrolled. Platelet‐reactive antibodies were explored in parallel by SB, FC and monoclonal antibody‐specific immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA) techniques. In a further study, chloroquine‐treated platelets were incubated with MAIPA‐positive serum, and then, the results of the SB and FC techniques were compared.
Results
Using MAIPA as a reference, antibodies were detected in 51 sera, with specificity for human leucocyte antigens (HLA), human platelet antigens (HPA) or both HLA/HPA, in 27, 18 and 6 patients, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SB and FC were 86·3%, 88·1%, 82·4% and 95·5%, respectively. The Spearman correlation revealed significant (P < 0·001) correlations between FC (r = 0·763) and SB (r = 0·738) with MAIPA. In respect to HPA antibody detection, SB had 83·3% sensitivity and 92·6% specificity compared to 91·7% and 96·3% for FC while both approaches are acceptable (P < 0·001, r = 0·69; P < 0·001, r = 0·773) and can be recommended.
Conclusions
The present study acknowledges that among the used methods, the flow cytometry's performance is the most appropriate, but slot blotting, with acceptable sensitivity, can be used as an acceptable and convenient procedure for platelet antibody screening.
“…Namely, these issues could be the determination of the presence, nature of platelet-reactive antibodies in patients' sera, and also the correlation rate of the first two tests with MAIPA assay. The present study is the first screening comparison of SB and FC for PR detection, but in the previous limited researches, SB was considered a relatively streamlined, sensitive, easily adaptable and applicable assay for detection of plasmodium-infected mosquito specimens, type I Glanzmann thrombasthenia and bovine herpesvirus type 1 [21,22,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the analysis conducted using this method is subjective and needs skilled personnel and expensive instrumentation. Another used method, slot blotting (SB), is a molecular technique applied to detect proteins/biomolecules and represents a simplification of the Western blot method with the advantages of rapidity, low cost, simplicity and availability that allows multiple samples to be evaluated simultaneously [21,22]. In this method, the sample is loaded directly on a nitrocellulose membrane, and the blotting procedure is performed.…”
Background and Objectives
Frequent platelet transfusion may lead to the formation of alloantibodies and immune‐mediated platelet destruction. Currently, identifying economic and effective screening methods is necessary for the management of platelet transfusion while different tests were recommended. The present study aims to challenge the performance of slot blotting (SB) and flow cytometry (FC) assays in detecting immune platelet refractoriness.
Materials and Methods
Sera from 118 patients who received blood components and were clinically suspected of platelet refractoriness were enrolled. Platelet‐reactive antibodies were explored in parallel by SB, FC and monoclonal antibody‐specific immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA) techniques. In a further study, chloroquine‐treated platelets were incubated with MAIPA‐positive serum, and then, the results of the SB and FC techniques were compared.
Results
Using MAIPA as a reference, antibodies were detected in 51 sera, with specificity for human leucocyte antigens (HLA), human platelet antigens (HPA) or both HLA/HPA, in 27, 18 and 6 patients, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SB and FC were 86·3%, 88·1%, 82·4% and 95·5%, respectively. The Spearman correlation revealed significant (P < 0·001) correlations between FC (r = 0·763) and SB (r = 0·738) with MAIPA. In respect to HPA antibody detection, SB had 83·3% sensitivity and 92·6% specificity compared to 91·7% and 96·3% for FC while both approaches are acceptable (P < 0·001, r = 0·69; P < 0·001, r = 0·773) and can be recommended.
Conclusions
The present study acknowledges that among the used methods, the flow cytometry's performance is the most appropriate, but slot blotting, with acceptable sensitivity, can be used as an acceptable and convenient procedure for platelet antibody screening.
Plum pox virus (PPV) is a causal agent of the stone fruit tree sharka disease that often causes enormous economic losses. Due to its worldwide distribution and economic importance, rapid and reliable diagnostic technologies are becoming increasingly important for successful management of sharka disease. In this study, we have produced two super-sensitive and specific anti-PPV monoclonal antibodies (i.e., MAbs 13H4 and 4A11). Using these two MAbs, we have now developed a dot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (dot-ELISA) and a colloidal gold immunochromatographic strip (CGICS) assay. These two technologies can be used to quickly and reliably detect PPV. The results of these sensitivity assays confirmed that the dot-ELISA and CGICS assays could detect PPV infection in apricot tree leaf crude extracts diluted up to 1:5120 and 1:6400 (w/v), respectively. Further analyses using field-collected apricot tree leaf samples showed that the detection endpoint of the dot-ELISA was ~26 times above that obtained through RT-PCR, and the CGICS was as sensitive as RT-PCR. This present study is to broaden the knowledge about detection limits of dot-ELISA and CGICS for PPV monitoring. We consider that these newly developed dot-ELISA and CGICS are particularly useful for large scale PPV surveys in fields.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.