2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a model for the estimation of photosynthetically active radiation from geostationary satellite data in a tropical environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We fully acknowledge that many other algorithms exist and are applied to the region; these include for AVHRR, the Global Aerosol Climatology Project (GACP) product of Mishchenko et al (1999), the Indian AVHRR products of Hashim et al (2004) and Parameswaran et al (2004), and a large collection of ocean sensor products as outlined by Myhre et al (2004Myhre et al ( , 2005a. There has been sporadic use of geostationary data as well (e.g., Janjai and Wattan, 2011).…”
Section: Dark Target Aerosol Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We fully acknowledge that many other algorithms exist and are applied to the region; these include for AVHRR, the Global Aerosol Climatology Project (GACP) product of Mishchenko et al (1999), the Indian AVHRR products of Hashim et al (2004) and Parameswaran et al (2004), and a large collection of ocean sensor products as outlined by Myhre et al (2004Myhre et al ( , 2005a. There has been sporadic use of geostationary data as well (e.g., Janjai and Wattan, 2011).…”
Section: Dark Target Aerosol Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAR can also been estimated using irradiative transfer models [5], [12]. Notwithstanding, the accuracy of these latter methods is not good enough for large areas [13][14]. Another widely used method is to estimate PAR from the routinely measured global solar radiation (H) by considering the PAR fraction as a constant for a specific area [15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAR has to be estimated through either empirical/semiphysical methods or remote sensing techniques (e.g. [24,1]), for example, Van Laake and Sanchez-Azofeifa [37] proposed a method (PARcalc) for mapping instantaneous PAR from MODIS data based on radiative transfer equations, they further calculated the daily integrated PAR in Costa Rica and the average errors were 5-8% [38,27] mapped the incident PAR from MODIS data over China by matching the computed TOA (top of atmosphere) reflectance from a look-up table with the TOA values from the satellite observation; Janjai and Wattan [22] developed a model for estimating PAR from geostationary satellite in a tropical environment (Thailand) and the monthly average hourly root mean square error (RMSE) was about 9.8%; Leuchner et al [25] analyzed the spatial variability of PAR in European beech and Norway spruce; Qin et al [31] estimated the daily mean PAR at seven widely distributed Surface Radiation Budget Network (SUR-FRAD) stations around the world using relative sunshine data, and the RMSE was ranging from 6.03 to 6.83 W m À 2 ; Mizoguchi et al [30] estimated PAR using general meteorological elements at five sites in Japan and found that the RMSE was smaller than 5.2%. However, it was reported that many of many studies were focused on clear sky conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%