2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-015-9605-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a metacognitive effort construct of empathy during clinical training: a longitudinal study of the factor structure of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this study is unique in that it provides an in‐depth, longitudinal assessment of several component processes of empathy, both self‐reported and behavioural, across a large number of students and multiple time‐points, it has some limitations. First, the sample size is small compared with those of recent work that has examined changes in empathy over time during medical training as assessed by the JSPE, as well as its factor validity . However, this sample size is comparable with those in much of the other longitudinal research on changes in empathy over the course of medical school, and this is the first study, to the present authors’ knowledge, to assess and compare empathy changes in medical students as assessed by the JSPE, or empathy in the context of the physician–patient interaction, and by a more general measure of students’ capacity for empathy, the QCAE, along with measures designed to assess the behavioural manifestation of this capacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although this study is unique in that it provides an in‐depth, longitudinal assessment of several component processes of empathy, both self‐reported and behavioural, across a large number of students and multiple time‐points, it has some limitations. First, the sample size is small compared with those of recent work that has examined changes in empathy over time during medical training as assessed by the JSPE, as well as its factor validity . However, this sample size is comparable with those in much of the other longitudinal research on changes in empathy over the course of medical school, and this is the first study, to the present authors’ knowledge, to assess and compare empathy changes in medical students as assessed by the JSPE, or empathy in the context of the physician–patient interaction, and by a more general measure of students’ capacity for empathy, the QCAE, along with measures designed to assess the behavioural manifestation of this capacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…First, the sample size is small compared with those of recent work that has examined changes in empathy over time during medical training as assessed by the JSPE, as well as its factor validity. 13 However, this sample size is comparable with those in much of the other longitudinal research on changes in empathy over the course of medical school, 10,14 and this is the first study, to the present authors' knowledge, to assess and compare empathy changes in medical students as assessed by the JSPE, or empathy in the context of the physician-patient interaction, and by a more general measure of students' capacity for empathy, the QCAE, along with measures designed to assess the behavioural manifestation of this capacity. Additionally, there may be potential bias as a result of the self-selection of participants in that patterns of change may be different in students who did not volunteer for the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a large scale exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic study with allopathic medical students (Stansfield et al 2016), a 3-factor model was confirmed as an acceptable fit for the preclinical years, but a 4-factor model emerged as a better fit for the clinical years of medical school education. Similarly, the 3-factor structure was also confirmed in medical students from two Spanish medical schools (Ferreira-Valente et al 2016), and in Turkish medical students (Bilgel and Ozcakir 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%