2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13361-016-1564-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Magnetic Microbead Affinity Selection Screen (MagMASS) Using Mass Spectrometry for Ligands to the Retinoid X Receptor-α

Abstract: To overcome limiting factors in mass spectrometry-based screening methods such as automation while still facilitating the screening of complex mixtures such as botanical extracts, magnetic microbead affinity selection screening (MagMASS) was developed. The screening process involves immobilization of a target protein on a magnetic microbead using a variety of possible chemistries, incubation with mixtures of molecules containing possible ligands, a washing step that removes non-bound compounds while a magnetic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we show that magnetic bead capture-based AS-MS 33,34 is capable of identifying binders from libraries of up to~10 8 random synthetic peptides (Fig. 1b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Here, we show that magnetic bead capture-based AS-MS 33,34 is capable of identifying binders from libraries of up to~10 8 random synthetic peptides (Fig. 1b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…To improve the speed of screening, a Magnetic Microbead Affinity Selection Screening (MagMASS) protocol was developed, in which the protein target of interest is not free in solution, but rather is bound to magnetic beads. 175 To separate compounds with and without affinity for the given target, the receptor-bound fraction can be held in solution using a magnet. 175 In a recent study, PUF-MS and MagMASS were compared, and both screening methods were found to reliably identify ligands of a specific molecular target from complex botanical matrices.…”
Section: Elucidating Mechanisms That Underlie Synergy and Antagonismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…175 To separate compounds with and without affinity for the given target, the receptor-bound fraction can be held in solution using a magnet. 175 In a recent study, PUF-MS and MagMASS were compared, and both screening methods were found to reliably identify ligands of a specific molecular target from complex botanical matrices. 175 MagMASS showed a 6-fold faster separation of bound and unbound compounds when compared to PUF-MS and is compatible with a 96-well plate format.…”
Section: Elucidating Mechanisms That Underlie Synergy and Antagonismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a previous report (Yasuda et al, 2011) showed covalent immobilization led to the destruction of the activity of enzymes. The team of van Breemen (Rush et al, 2017) made a comparison between a magnetic microbead affinity‐MS‐based screening method and the PUF‐MS method for screening of retinoid X receptors (RXRα) inhibitors from botanical extracts and combinatorial libraries. Protein consumption during magnetic microbead affinity‐MS screening is minimal, requiring only 100 pmol per well.…”
Section: Ba‐ms Relying On Solid‐phase Micro‐extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%