2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method for iron speciation and determination in different water samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The membrane-based sensor may not be as ultrasensitive as other reported methods, 7,8 as shown in Table 2, but it offers a simple one-step procedure with an easy colorimetric readout. Most of the reported methods are multistep 4 that involve complex methodologies, 2,6 or device fabrication 18,19 that require a high-degree of expertise.…”
Section: Figure Of Meritsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The membrane-based sensor may not be as ultrasensitive as other reported methods, 7,8 as shown in Table 2, but it offers a simple one-step procedure with an easy colorimetric readout. Most of the reported methods are multistep 4 that involve complex methodologies, 2,6 or device fabrication 18,19 that require a high-degree of expertise.…”
Section: Figure Of Meritsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9] Even though most of these technique are highly selective as well as sensitive, but lack of easy operational protocols along with complex methodology limit their usage in field applications. The rapidly growing issues of water pollution make it an ambulatory necessity to design sensing devices that are easy to operate and read by non-technical personnel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many techniques are useful in determination of iron ions (5,6). The most significant of these techniques useful in determination of iron ions are UV-Vis spectrophotometry, graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS), inductive coupled plasma-atomic/optic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES/OES), cathodic stripping voltammetry techniques (CLE-ACSV), flow injection analysis (FIA), ion chromatography (IC) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) (7)(8)(9)(10)(11). Iron at high concentrations may cause various health problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important of these methods are liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), co-precipitation, solid phase extraction (SPE), cloud point extraction (CPE), microextraction and adsorption/ Downloaded by [The University of Manchester Library] at 02: 10 12 October 2014 absorption (9,(24)(25)(26). Water insoluble or crosslinked polymeric resins and the modified resins with selective groups for iron ions are used for selective sorption and pre-concentration of iron ions from aqueous media (27)(28)(29)(30).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Although good analytical methods of metal ion estimation like atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) and X ray fluorescent spectrometry (XRF) detect metal ions at mg L −1 (ppm) and even lower concentrations, they cannot distinguish any difference in the metal oxidation states and as such are inappropriate for iron speciation. Many alternate methods [9][10][11][12][13] have been reported in literature for simultaneous determination of iron(II) and iron(III) in different samples. However, sampling, sample handling, pre-concentration and/or separation of the speciated forms requires rigorous procedures with sophisticated instrumentation inaccessible to common labs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%