2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a dairy cattle drinking water quality index (DCWQI) based on fuzzy inference systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, great attention has been paid to the development of environmental indices based on fuzzy logic (Gharibi et al, 2012;Lu et al, 1999;Mirabbasi et al, 2008;Sasikumar and Mujumdar, 1998;Sowlat et al, 2011), especially when applied to the analysis of water quality (Chang et al, 2001;Icaga, 2007;Lermontov et al, 2009;Liou et al, 2003;Ocampo-Duque et al, 2006, 2007. However, since the number of parameters included in the WQI and the above mentioned fuzzy indices is limited, these indices do not seem to be representative of the overall water quality and an individual parameter may have a considerable impact on the final index value (Ocampo-Duque et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, great attention has been paid to the development of environmental indices based on fuzzy logic (Gharibi et al, 2012;Lu et al, 1999;Mirabbasi et al, 2008;Sasikumar and Mujumdar, 1998;Sowlat et al, 2011), especially when applied to the analysis of water quality (Chang et al, 2001;Icaga, 2007;Lermontov et al, 2009;Liou et al, 2003;Ocampo-Duque et al, 2006, 2007. However, since the number of parameters included in the WQI and the above mentioned fuzzy indices is limited, these indices do not seem to be representative of the overall water quality and an individual parameter may have a considerable impact on the final index value (Ocampo-Duque et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, most WQIs have been developed for general water purposes, such as Horton's Index, the National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) Index, the British Columbia Water Quality Index, the Oregon Water Quality Index, the Overall Index of Pollution, the River Pollution Index (RPI), and the Universal Water Quality Index (Liou et al 2004). Only a few WQIs have been developed based on specific water-use purposes, such as the water supply or drinking water (Mohebbi et al 2013;Wanda et al 2012;Ramesh et al 2010), recreation or water sports (Smith and Daviescolley 1992;Anderson et al 2012;Kamizoulis and Saliba 2004;Marino et al 1995;Nagels et al 2001), public bathing (Smith et al 1991;Kamizoulis and Saliba 2004;Kay 1988), estuaries or coastal water systems (Garcia-Marin et al 2013;Neto et al 2013), irrigation or agriculture (Goss and Richards 2008;Herricks and Suen 2006;Al-Bassam and Ai-Rumikhani 2003;Wang et al 2011), livestock (Gharibi et al 2012), and marine shrimp culture (Ferreira et al 2011). Many government agencies have applied WQI to develop their own standards for various water purposes, which differ with regard to the specific terms used for the classification schemes and in the selection of indicator parameters (Bordalo et al 2006;Sarkar and Abbasi 2006;Suen and Herricks 2009;Bordalo et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singh et al (2011) studied the current status of water quality in India and developed a WQI for groundwater and aquifers in that region. Gharibi et al (2012) created a WQI for the water supply for dairy cattle in Iran. Finally, Varbiró et al (2012) used limnological variables associated with pollution indices to characterize water bodies in Hungary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%