2017
DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2017.080704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of A Clinically-Oriented Expert System for Differentiating Melanocytic from Non-melanocytic Skin Lesions

Abstract: These experimental results indicate that the proposed COE-Deep system is better than state-of-the-art systems. Hence, the COEDeep system is able to assist dermatologists during the screening process of skin cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Stanford team utilized the CNN-PA algorithm to train a network on their own dataset, which consisted of 129,450 images of skin lesions taken using mobile phones, as well as a subset of publicly available datasets. The accuracy of the network model reached 72.1% and 55.4% for the three-class classi cation task, which is comparable to the performance of 21 experts in differentiating basal cell carcinoma and malignant melanoma (12). In another investigation, a CNN was employed for extracting lesion features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The Stanford team utilized the CNN-PA algorithm to train a network on their own dataset, which consisted of 129,450 images of skin lesions taken using mobile phones, as well as a subset of publicly available datasets. The accuracy of the network model reached 72.1% and 55.4% for the three-class classi cation task, which is comparable to the performance of 21 experts in differentiating basal cell carcinoma and malignant melanoma (12). In another investigation, a CNN was employed for extracting lesion features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The accuracy performance of AlexNet, Xception, VGGNet16 and VGGNet19 architectures was reported as 84%, 90%, 89% and 90%, respectively [26]. Abbas et al [27] developed a deep learning (COE-Deep) architecture to detect melanocytic and non-melanocytic (MnM) skin lesions. They used the convolutional neural network (CNN) model for feature extraction and reported an average network test success of 90% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 91.5% accuracy, and AUC=0.92 in ISIC dataset [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbas et al [27] developed a deep learning (COE-Deep) architecture to detect melanocytic and non-melanocytic (MnM) skin lesions. They used the convolutional neural network (CNN) model for feature extraction and reported an average network test success of 90% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 91.5% accuracy, and AUC=0.92 in ISIC dataset [27]. Deif et al [28] proposed four different CNN architectures for the classification of skin lesions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such results were obtained once they used a 10-fold cross-validation test. The proposed deep COE system is best suited to the classification of non-melanocytic skin lesions to improve accuracy, reliability, and accessibility of pigmented skin lesions screening system [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%