2019
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11081196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, Implementation and Assessment of Molecular Diagnostics by Next Generation Sequencing in Personalized Treatment of Cancer: Experience of a Public Reference Healthcare Hospital

Abstract: The establishment of precision medicine in cancer patients requires the study of several biomarkers. Single-gene testing approaches are limited by sample availability and turnaround time. Next generation sequencing (NGS) provides an alternative for detecting genetic alterations in several genes with low sample requirements. Here we show the implementation to routine diagnostics of a NGS assay under International Organization for Standardization (UNE-EN ISO 15189:2013) accreditation. For this purpose, 106 non-s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although both techniques (NGS and nCounter) require minimum amounts of genetic material, our dropout percentage increased to 15% when considering those samples for which DNA or RNA testing could not be performed. Some groups, which also included combined DNA and RNA in their sequencing workflows, have reported lower invalid test rates of approximately 2%-3% [18,24]. However, these results do not correspond to the total screening failure rates, which should include samples with insufficient material, the major reason for failure in our series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Although both techniques (NGS and nCounter) require minimum amounts of genetic material, our dropout percentage increased to 15% when considering those samples for which DNA or RNA testing could not be performed. Some groups, which also included combined DNA and RNA in their sequencing workflows, have reported lower invalid test rates of approximately 2%-3% [18,24]. However, these results do not correspond to the total screening failure rates, which should include samples with insufficient material, the major reason for failure in our series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In January 2021, as a consequence of the accreditation of NGS techniques under the UNE-EN ISO 15189:2022 standard [ 14 ], the Lung Cancer Committee of our hospital decided to establish NGS as a routine testing strategy for the molecular profiling of NSCLC. During this period, 128 samples were analyzed using NGS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several mutant genes (TP53, KRAS, PIK3CA, HER2 and BRAF) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are identified by using NGS plateforms. 70,71 Mutated P53 is quite common in advanced CRC and APE1 is overexpressed in CRC. The relationship between P53 and APE1 has been studied recently.…”
Section: Colorectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%