Development, Evaluation, and Utility of a Peer Evaluation Form for Online Teaching

Gaskamp, Carol D.; Kintner, Eileen Kae

doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000000007

Cited by 8 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 12 publications

(14 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This rich data allows peer reviewers to see aspects of a course that are largely unseen in face‐to‐face course sessions but explodes the scope of content for the reviewer to “observe”. Furthermore, the type of available data in an online course is also different (Gaskamp & Kintner, 2014; Vega García et al., 2017). Online course reviews tend to emphasize course design issues—how clear and easy to understand are the instructions and learning materials?…”

Section: Course Modality and Peer Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating instructor quality: Moving away from student evaluations to peer review

Quenette

Rybas

2023

New Drctns for Teach & Learn

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Course Modality and Peer Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating instructor quality: Moving away from student evaluations to peer review

Quenette

Rybas

2023

New Drctns for Teach & Learn

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some instruments were more prescriptive (eg, PALI, POET) with mandatory sections, 36,40,41,48,53 whereas others provided a menu of category options for faculty to select which they are to provide feedback. 55 ree articles presented instruments specifically used for PRT of web-based courses, 37,38,42 including e College of Public Health Online Course Standards and quality matters Peer Course Review Rubric. 38 Berk et al 35 provided a 5-step process for how to generate a review instrument, and 12 articles published and provided access to their instruments.…”

Section: Trainingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…e review sample was variable (Table 2) and included reviews and commentaries (3), [29][30][31] evaluations of multiple, interinstitutional PRT programs (3), [32][33][34] instrument development and evaluation (8), [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] descriptive case studies (7), [42][43][44][45][46][47][48] and case studies with program evaluation (14). 17,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] Health care educational programs represented included dentistry (2), 34,52 medicine ( 14) 31,33,[39][40][41]44,47,54,[56]…”

Section: Characteristics Of Included Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…43 No articles reported on the use of PRT in physical therapist education programs. Geographic representation included Australia (1), 49 Canada (3), 17,33,56 Germany (1), 58 United States ( 22), 33,35,[37][38][39][40][41][42][44][45][46][47]54,55,61,62 and United Kingdom (6). 34,51,52,57,59,60 Sixty-three percent (63%) were published after 2010.…”

Section: Characteristics Of Included Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…17,42,43,45,47-51, [53][54][55][56][57][58]60 Of the 28 articles that reported on their use of instruments, 12 (43%) were tailored to program needs based on preestablished tools in the literature and core competencies and principles of teaching. 17,37,42,43,45,47,49,54,55,57,58,60 Valid and reliable tools included the peer assessment of lecturing instrument (PALI), [39][40][41]56,58 peer observation evaluation tool (POET), 36,48,53 Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing Peer Observation Scale, 35 and the Australian Learning and Teaching Council Peer Review Tool. 49 e PALI has undergone the most testing and refinement, and it was subsequently widely referenced in our sample.…”

Section: Trainingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Peer Review of Teaching to Promote a Culture of Excellence: A Scoping Review

Hinrichs¹,

Judd²,

Hernandez³

et al. 2022

JOPTE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Purpose. A main component of the conceptual model of excellence in physical therapist education, introduced by Jensen et al, is a culture of excellence. A culture of excellence relies on identifying accountable faculty who set high expectations and execute systems toward ongoing improvement. Peer review of teaching (PRT) is an established system that cultivates a culture of collaboration, reflection, and excellence through feedback and collegial discourse. The purpose of this scoping review was to understand PRT implementation by 1) summarizing the program development process, 2) identifying program characteristics, 3) identifying review instruments, and 4) determining program evaluation strategies. Methods. A scoping review was conducted using a methodological framework. With library scientist counsel, search terms were established, and 3 databases were queried for articles describing PRT programs in health care education. Articles were managed in the Covidence Systematic Review Management Software. Researchers independently screened search results for article inclusion and extracted data from included studies. Descriptive data analysis was conducted. Results. Thirty-five articles met inclusion criteria. Seven different health care professions have published PRT articles; however, none in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) education. Results indicated that most programs underwent a systematic development process, included faculty input, and sought to ensure consistency between the program purpose and characteristics. A 3-step formative process was most common. Faculty were paired systematically or used self-selection. Evaluative instruments were often program specific, guided by core competencies of teaching excellence or previously published tools. Program outcomes commonly reported positive faculty opinion of PRT and teaching improvement. Only 2 articles evaluated student metrics to assess PRT impact and effectiveness. Discussion and Conclusion. Peer review of teaching has been successfully adopted by health care education faculty to promote teaching excellence and could be a foundation for creating a culture of excellence in DPT education. These results provide an understanding of the processes for implementing PRT to guide DPT educators establishing PRT programs.

show abstract

The role of formative evaluation in the teaching/learning process at ISPITS in Morocco: Exploratory study of teachers involved in the health environment option

El Filali,

Assermouh,

El Yaakoubi

et al. 2023

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Formative evaluation (FE) of teaching and learning (TL) is a pedagogical innovation in many educational systems around the world, such as Switzerland, France, and Quebec. In Morocco, the Higher Institutes for Nursing and Health Technology (ISPITS) has introduced FE into its training curriculum, including the Health and Environment (HE) option. Our exploratory study of teachers of this option at ISPITS (N = 60) aims to examine the current state of practices relating to this type of assessment at these institutes. The results of this research revealed that 75% of teachers do not use formative assessment tools, 55% find that it increases their workload, and 48% report its interest to both teachers and learners. Half of the teachers agree that formative assessment should be operationalized systematically in the training process. Our study reports the gap between what competent bodies designed and validated and the actual practices used. Consequently, we believe that narrowing this gap will undoubtedly contribute to the development of learners’ specific skills in environmental responsibility and protection.

show abstract

Development, Evaluation, and Utility of a Peer Evaluation Form for Online Teaching

Cited by 8 publications

References 12 publications

Evaluating instructor quality: Moving away from student evaluations to peer review

Evaluating instructor quality: Moving away from student evaluations to peer review

Peer Review of Teaching to Promote a Culture of Excellence: A Scoping Review

The role of formative evaluation in the teaching/learning process at ISPITS in Morocco: Exploratory study of teachers involved in the health environment option

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About