2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00244-003-2270-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, Evaluation, and Application of Sediment Quality Targets for Assessing and Managing Contaminated Sediments in Tampa Bay, Florida

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to congregate sediment toxicant levels into more manageable indices, these data were used to estimate sediment quality guideline quotients (SQG-Qs) for each class of contaminants and for total contamination, according to Long and MacDonald (1998) , following contrasting to the probable effects level (PEL) guidelines for marine pollutants, available for most analyzed substances ( MacDonald et al, 1996 ). The SQG-Q scores provide a measure of risk, allowing sediments to be classified as unimpacted if SQG-Q < 0.1; moderately impacted if 0.1 < SQG-Q < 1 and highly impacted if SQG-Q > 1 ( MacDonald et al, 2004 ). Table 1 summarizes the main sediment contamination data and respective SQG-Qs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to congregate sediment toxicant levels into more manageable indices, these data were used to estimate sediment quality guideline quotients (SQG-Qs) for each class of contaminants and for total contamination, according to Long and MacDonald (1998) , following contrasting to the probable effects level (PEL) guidelines for marine pollutants, available for most analyzed substances ( MacDonald et al, 1996 ). The SQG-Q scores provide a measure of risk, allowing sediments to be classified as unimpacted if SQG-Q < 0.1; moderately impacted if 0.1 < SQG-Q < 1 and highly impacted if SQG-Q > 1 ( MacDonald et al, 2004 ). Table 1 summarizes the main sediment contamination data and respective SQG-Qs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower the value of SQGQ is, the lighter the pollution is. Three levels of biological effects can be grouped according to the values of SQGQ: (1) no adverse biological effects (SQGQ < 0.1); (2) moderate adverse biological effects (0.1 SQGQ < 1); and (3) high adverse biological effects (SQGQ !1) (Costa et al, 2011;MacDonald et al, 2004). For BDH, DY, and YC, where 100% of sediments samples had concentrations below the ISQGs (Fig.…”
Section: Risk Assessment Of Ocps In Intertidal Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A chemical-physical and ecotoxicological approach was identified as the most appropriate and objective criterion for assessing these values. Specifically, the "effect level approach, " which statistically associates chemical and biological data to define sediment concentration levels with rare toxic effects [threshold effect level (TEL)] and levels above which the effects are frequently encountered [probable effect level (PEL)], was adopted (Long et al, 1995;MacDonald et al, 1996MacDonald et al, , 2004. After that, action levels were determined by taking into account site-specific chemical and ecotoxicological data for each SIN, according to standardized procedures by national and/or international bodies such as ISO, USEPA, ASTM, and UNI ( Table 2).…”
Section: Investigation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%