Objective-To develop a Chinese version of the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI-C) and evaluate the reliability and validity of its scores.
Design-A two-week test-retest study.Setting-Chinese community in Vancouver, BC, Canada.Participants-Data were collected using a convenience sample of Chinese immigrants living in Vancouver, BC, Canada. Of the 73 participants, data from 66 participants were included in the analysis. The total sample included two subsamples: community dwelling (n = 32), and assisted living (n = 34). Participants were 65 years or older, lived in Canada for more than five years and were able to read Chinese.
Interventions-Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure-FAI-C scores.Results-Test-retest reliability of the FAI-C scores assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.86 (95% Confidence interval (CI) = 0.79-0.92) for the total sample, 0.89 (95% CI = 0.78-0.94) for the community dwelling subsample, and 0.71 (95% CI = 0.50-0.85) for the assisted living subsample. The minimal detectable difference (MDD) at 95% CI was 8.64. Correlations between the FAI-C and the Reintegration to Normal Living Index (r = 0.61, p < 0.01), Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale (r = 0.55, p < 0.01), and Timed Up and Go (r = − 0.68, p < 0.01) were in the a priori hypothesized direction and magnitude.Corresponding Author: William C Miller; address: G F Strong Rehabilitation Centre, 4255 Laurel Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 2G9;; bcmiller@telus.net. Financial Disclosure: We certify that no party having a direct interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on us or on any organization with which we are associated AND, if applicable, we certify that all financial and material support for this research (eg, NIH or NHS grants)
CIHR Author Manuscript
CIHR Author Manuscript
CIHR Author ManuscriptConclusions-The FAI-C scores are reliable and there is support for validity. This tool enables us to measure social participation level in the Chinese-speaking population.
KeywordsAsian continental ancestry group; Rehabilitation; Reproducibility of results A commonly identified limitation of many studies is that a certain contingent of the population may need to be excluded from the study because the instruments of interest were not available in the mother tongue of a section of the population. Chinese is the most common language in the world, yet many commonly used health-related outcome measures are not available in this language. Many of our studies inquire about the activities participants perform in their own community. Despite representing such a large proportion of our population, we are often compelled to exclude Chinese-speaking participants from research studies because of language barriers. The exclusion of otherwise eligible immigrant population could lead to systematic bias when only representing the dominant ethnicity of the country. 4 Therefore, it is imperative for outcome measures to be translated and validated in other languages.Se...