2015
DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2015.1078834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS)

Abstract: Although a number of instruments have been used to measure Internet skills in nationally representative surveys, there are several challenges with the measures available: incompleteness and over-simplification, conceptual ambiguity, and the use of self-reports. Here, we aim to overcome these challenges by developing a set of reliable measures for use in research, practice, and policy evaluations based on a strong conceptual framework. To achieve this goal, we carried out a literature review of skills related s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
231
0
12

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
9
231
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Child‐related variables included age (mean 10.54 years, SD 2.61, range 6–14) and gender (46% girls). We measured digital skills on an agreement scale (5 = very true of my child to 1 = not at all true of my child ) for operational skills (five items), information/browsing skills (five items), social skills (five items), creative skills (five items), and mobile skills (four items) (adapted from van Deursen et al, ) . Online opportunities were measured with the question, “how often does your child perform the following Internet activities?” [randomized presentation]; with frequency measured on a scale from 5 = every day or almost every day to 1 = never for each of 17 activities (e.g., “use the Internet for school work,” “watch video clips,” “download music or films”) (from Livingstone et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Child‐related variables included age (mean 10.54 years, SD 2.61, range 6–14) and gender (46% girls). We measured digital skills on an agreement scale (5 = very true of my child to 1 = not at all true of my child ) for operational skills (five items), information/browsing skills (five items), social skills (five items), creative skills (five items), and mobile skills (four items) (adapted from van Deursen et al, ) . Online opportunities were measured with the question, “how often does your child perform the following Internet activities?” [randomized presentation]; with frequency measured on a scale from 5 = every day or almost every day to 1 = never for each of 17 activities (e.g., “use the Internet for school work,” “watch video clips,” “download music or films”) (from Livingstone et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Child-related variables included age (mean 10.54 years, SD 2.61, range 6-14) and gender (46% girls). We measured digital skills on an agreement scale (5 = very true of my child to 1 = not at all true of my child) for operational skills (five items), information/browsing skills (five items), social skills (five items), creative skills (five items), and mobile skills (four items) (adapted from van Deursen et al, 2015). 1 Online opportunities were measured with the question, "how often does your child perform the following Internet activities?"…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reported skill, which are tested against observations of use in everyday practice, would also be an important development in this regard (Van Deursen et al, 2015). While this study was unique in its use of data collected over time, the data were still cohort based.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors took into consideration four basic skills: operational, formal, information search and strategic. The findings obtained reveal the importance of the student's educational and cultural environment in the development of this competence (Van Deursen, Helsper, & Eynon, 2016;Van Deursen & Van Diepen, 2013).…”
Section: Assessment Of Digital Competence: Previous Studies and Currementioning
confidence: 81%