1996
DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.2.321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of the State Hope Scale.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants’ perceived agency will be assessed using the agency subscale of the State Hope Scale. 42 Participants rate the extent to which they endorse items on an 8-point Likert scale. The agency subscale consists of three items that relate to an individual’s propensity to engage in goal-directed thinking and purse-related actions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants’ perceived agency will be assessed using the agency subscale of the State Hope Scale. 42 Participants rate the extent to which they endorse items on an 8-point Likert scale. The agency subscale consists of three items that relate to an individual’s propensity to engage in goal-directed thinking and purse-related actions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to wishful thinking, hope spurs individuals to realize the goals they have set for themselves . Hope derives from both the energy directed toward goals and the pathway for their achievement (Snyder et al, 1996). The continual interplay between determination and strategy fuels creativity and innovation, ultimately fostering greater control over one's actions.…”
Section: Psychological Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly problematic are Likert-type scales with multiple anchor points (e.g., extremely unlikely, very unlikely, somewhat unlikely, unlikely). For example, The State of Hope Scale (Snyder et al, 1996) had an eight-point Likert response level (i.e., Definitely False, Mostly False, Somewhat False, Slightly False, Slightly True, Somewhat True, Mostly True, Definitely True). When administering the instrument, research staff noticed that participants had a difficult time differentiating between the levels.…”
Section: A Six-stage Process Of Instrument Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%