2016
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/bmw087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of an LC–MS-MS Method for Determination of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid in Human Plasma: Application to a Pharmacokinetic Study

Abstract: A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of simvastatin (SV) and simvastatin acid (SVA) in human plasma. To improve assay sensitivity and achieve simultaneous analysis, SVA monitored in (-)ESI (electrospray ionization) mode within the first 4.5 min and SV thereafter in (+)ESI mode. The separation of all compounds was achieved in about 6.2 min using a C18 reverse-phase fused-core(®) column (Ascentis(®) Express C18) and a mobile phase,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LC-MS/MS assay methods were reported for the simultaneous analysis of simvastatin and simvastatin acid [11][12][13][14][15][16], but some of these methods had a relatively long run time (10, 8 and 6.4 min [11,13,15]) with larger volume of plasma used (475, 300, 1000, 300 μl [11][12][13]16]), compared to our developed method (5 min run with 200 μl of plasma). Finally, most of these method used solid-phase extraction technique for plasma sample preparation [13][14][15][16], which is labor intensive, more time consuming and costly than the liquid-liquid extraction method we used. Analysis methods for the quantification of ATV and its two active metabolites, 2-OH-ATV and 4-OH-ATV, have been reported [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…LC-MS/MS assay methods were reported for the simultaneous analysis of simvastatin and simvastatin acid [11][12][13][14][15][16], but some of these methods had a relatively long run time (10, 8 and 6.4 min [11,13,15]) with larger volume of plasma used (475, 300, 1000, 300 μl [11][12][13]16]), compared to our developed method (5 min run with 200 μl of plasma). Finally, most of these method used solid-phase extraction technique for plasma sample preparation [13][14][15][16], which is labor intensive, more time consuming and costly than the liquid-liquid extraction method we used. Analysis methods for the quantification of ATV and its two active metabolites, 2-OH-ATV and 4-OH-ATV, have been reported [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The inter-day precision and accuracy were evaluated by analysing fourteen QC replicates run on four consecutive days. Accuracy is required to be within±15% for QC samples [30]. Recovery was calculated for five spiked POVPC concentrations (0.1, 0.5,1, 2 and 5 ng/ml) within the linear dynamic range, and presented as a percentage of original material.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recovery was calculated for six replicates of each compound and presented as a percentage of initial material. Precision is required to be within ±15% and accuracy between 85-115% [27] Analysis of POVPC levels…”
Section: Hplc Methods Precision Accuracy and Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…calibration curves are shown in supplementalTable 1. The accuracy was 90-106% and %CV of 5-7%[27]. The limit of detection (LOD) for lutein, zeaxanthin and the internal standard are 0.1, 0.1 and 0.05µM respectively while the limit of quantification (LOQ) for lutein, zeaxanthin and the internal standard are 0.5, 0.5 and 0.2µM respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%