Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting the Risk of Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Coronary Artery Ectasia

Abstract

Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is a rare finding and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. However, prognostic factors are not well studied and no prognostication tool is available. In a derivation set comprising 729 consecutive CAE patients between January 2009 and June 2014, a nomogram was developed using Cox regression. Total of 399 patients from July 2014 to December 2015 formed the validation set. The primary outcome was 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a component of cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Besides the clinical factors, we used quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and defined QCA classification of four types, according to max diameter (< or ≥5 mm) and max length ratio (ratio of lesion length to vessel length, < or ≥1/3) of the dilated lesion. A total of 27 cardiovascular deaths and 41 nonfatal myocardial infarctions occurred at 5-year follow-up. The nomogram effectively predicted 5-year MACE risk using predictors including age, prior PCI, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and QCA classification (area under curve [AUC] 0.75, 95% CI 0.68–0.82 in the derivation set; AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.56–0.86 in the validation set). Patients were classified as high-risk if prognostic scores were ≥155 and the Kaplan–Meier curves were well separated (log-rank p < 0.001 in both sets). Calibration curve and Hosmer–Lemeshow test indicated similarity between predicted and actual 5-year MACE survival (p = 0.90 in the derivation and p = 0.47 in the validation set). This study developed and validated a simple-to-use method for assessing 5-year MACE risk in patients with CAE.

Effect of type 2 diabetes on coronary artery ectasia: smaller lesion diameter and shorter lesion length but similar adverse cardiovascular events

“…Another reason was that diabetes itself was a risk factor for MACE, which might neutralize the protective effect in CAE. Our recent published article indicated that max diameter > 5 mm and diffuse CAE (lesion length > 1/3 of the vessels) was independent predictors of MACE in patients with CAE [ 39 ]. Thus, although diabetes is a traditional risk factor for cardiovascular adverse events, it also mitigated the angiographic anatomic risk factors in patients with CAE.…”