2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of a Three-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics Model of Root Canal Irrigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
95
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
95
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A strain gage signal conditioner was connected to the pressure transducer to sample the pressure measurements, and the output was sent to an oscilloscope (BK Precision, Yorba Linda, CA), providing 250 measurements per second. The range of apical pressures generated during positive pressure irrigation in this study showed excellent agreement with the range of pressures calculated for simulated irrigation at 6 mL/min using CFD analysis with the SST k-ω model in a previous study [ 108 ]. If the minimum and maximum apical pressure measurements calculated in this CFD study are converted into the pressure units used by Park et al [ 223 ] for a similar needle design and size, the apical pressure range is similar.…”
Section: Irrigation Pressure In the Apical Canalsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A strain gage signal conditioner was connected to the pressure transducer to sample the pressure measurements, and the output was sent to an oscilloscope (BK Precision, Yorba Linda, CA), providing 250 measurements per second. The range of apical pressures generated during positive pressure irrigation in this study showed excellent agreement with the range of pressures calculated for simulated irrigation at 6 mL/min using CFD analysis with the SST k-ω model in a previous study [ 108 ]. If the minimum and maximum apical pressure measurements calculated in this CFD study are converted into the pressure units used by Park et al [ 223 ] for a similar needle design and size, the apical pressure range is similar.…”
Section: Irrigation Pressure In the Apical Canalsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In CFD studies, the use of an unsuitable turbulence model may lead to potential numerical errors in CFD results [ 218 ]. In a study by Gao et al [ 108 ], four turbulent models [low Reynolds k-ε, low Reynolds renormalization group k-ε, transitional fl ow k-ω, and transitional fl ow shear stress transport (SST) k-ω] were used to simulate root canal irrigation because these turbulent models are suitable for studying fl ow with low Re. The results showed that the SST k-ω turbulence model appeared to be the most suitable for the problem investigated.…”
Section: Mathematical Virtual Simulation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debridement efficacy of an irrigation delivery/agitation system depends on how well the irrigant reaches the apical region, the uninstrumented zones, and creates a strong enough current to carry the debris out of the root canal coronally. [6][7][8][9][10] Positive-pressure irrigation is the most common method of introducing the irrigant in the root canals. Negative-pressure irrigation has been introduced in 2004 recently with promising results for apical irrigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) appear to be the most feasible method for studying the problem under consideration. Several studies confirmed the suitability of CFD for dental pulp study e.g., [13][14][15][16]. In a previous study [17], we have numerically investigated the delivery of bioactive therapeutic agents to the dentin-enamel junction (DEJ) through a typical dentin tubule that has no obstructions or alterations of any type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%