2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2022.167675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a simulation tool for K-edge Subtraction imaging with polychromatic spectra and X-ray photon counting detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the estimated x-ray spectrum and detector response, the energy response of the system was calculated for the threshold values, 26 and 33 keV, used in the acquisitions, as shown in figure 1 (b). The low threshold (26 keV) was chosen to exclude the cadmium fluorescence, while the high threshold (33 keV) was set to maximize the iodine’s K-edge contrast (Di Trapani et al 2023 ). Additionally, the x-ray spectrum was shaped to be symmetric and centered on the second threshold, thus ensuring nearly equal statistics in the two energy bins.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the estimated x-ray spectrum and detector response, the energy response of the system was calculated for the threshold values, 26 and 33 keV, used in the acquisitions, as shown in figure 1 (b). The low threshold (26 keV) was chosen to exclude the cadmium fluorescence, while the high threshold (33 keV) was set to maximize the iodine’s K-edge contrast (Di Trapani et al 2023 ). Additionally, the x-ray spectrum was shaped to be symmetric and centered on the second threshold, thus ensuring nearly equal statistics in the two energy bins.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%