1998
DOI: 10.13182/fst98-a11963713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Test of the ITER Conductor Joints for the Central Solenoid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The joints in any high current magnet like the CSMC and the CS Insert are very important elements, which could have become the limiting factor in the CSMC overall performance. Two types of 46 kA joints for the CSMC were developed and tested during an extensive R&D program 8,9 : a lap joint and a butt joint. The requirements to have a low resistance, low DC and AC losses and high reliability in a high field and high dB/dt environment made the joints quite complicated.…”
Section: Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The joints in any high current magnet like the CSMC and the CS Insert are very important elements, which could have become the limiting factor in the CSMC overall performance. Two types of 46 kA joints for the CSMC were developed and tested during an extensive R&D program 8,9 : a lap joint and a butt joint. The requirements to have a low resistance, low DC and AC losses and high reliability in a high field and high dB/dt environment made the joints quite complicated.…”
Section: Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupling of the terminations of these high current carrying coils is realised by highly performing, electrical joints. The joints are required to transfer high currents at low DC resistance (Martovetsky et al, 1998), and are simultaneously submitted to fast varying high magnetic fields, imposing large radial and axial forces. As a result of being one of the main resistive components, the joints are delicate components of the magnet system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both types of joint have advantages and disadvantages. The lap joint design is more structurally reliable and offers a better uniformity in current distribution [2]. The butt joint had lower AC losses and was insensitive to orientation of the transverse varying magnetic field [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%