2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0583-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and reliability assessment of a new quality appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies using biomarker data (BIOCROSS)

Abstract: BackgroundBiomarker-based analyses are commonly reported in observational epidemiological studies; however currently there are no specific study quality assessment tools to assist evaluation of conducted research. Accounting for study design and biomarker measurement would be important for deriving valid conclusions when conducting systematic data evaluation.MethodsWe developed a study quality assessment tool designed specifically to assess biomarker-based cross-sectional studies (BIOCROSS) and evaluated its i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment of the quality of studies was performed by three independent reviewers (CER, LK and TH) using a combination of tools specifically developed for the assessment of nutritional exposures (NUTRIGRADE) [ 27 ] and biomarker outcomes (BIOCROSS) [ 28 ]. These tools were additionally adapted to consider features of cross-sectional and intervention study designs of the included studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of the quality of studies was performed by three independent reviewers (CER, LK and TH) using a combination of tools specifically developed for the assessment of nutritional exposures (NUTRIGRADE) [ 27 ] and biomarker outcomes (BIOCROSS) [ 28 ]. These tools were additionally adapted to consider features of cross-sectional and intervention study designs of the included studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For quality assessment of the evidence (i.e., risk of bias and study quality), we applied the NutriGrade scoring system, which uses the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach [ 27 ]. To evaluate the quality of the biomarker measurement, we applied the Biomarker-based Cross-sectional studies (BIOCROSS) evaluation tool, which is especially adapted for biomarker measurement, representing biosample and assay methods, laboratory measurement, and biomarker data models [ 28 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of individual skeletal maturity is beneficial to both orthodontist and the patient. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Numerous maturity indicators are available based on morphologic and radiographic methods. Lateral cephalometric radiographic method as cervical vertebral maturation staging is preferred and adopted by the American Board of Orthodontics over the hand-wrist radiographic method to avoid extra radiation exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e quality assessment of the procedural accuracy of each article was executed as per the method described in BIOCROSS evaluation tool (Jan Wirsching et al 2018). [19] e BIOCROSS evaluation tool was applied to assess the quality of each of biomarker cross-sectional studies.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation