2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and psychometric validation of Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short-Form (IGDS9-SF) in a Brazilian sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on previous research, cutoff points of IGD 4 16 and IGD 4 21 were adopted to identify moderate and high risk for IGD. 9 Additional psychometric tests utilized included the Brazilian versions of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), 10 the Mini-Social Phobia Inventory (Mini-SPIN), 11 the Self-Report Questionnaire (SRQ-20), 12 the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-BR), 13 the 21-item Brazilian version of the Game Addiction Scale (GAS), 6 and the suicidal ideation question (item 17) of the SRQ-20. Additional questions were designed to collect data on sociodemographic characteristics, gaming behavior, and perceived academic performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on previous research, cutoff points of IGD 4 16 and IGD 4 21 were adopted to identify moderate and high risk for IGD. 9 Additional psychometric tests utilized included the Brazilian versions of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), 10 the Mini-Social Phobia Inventory (Mini-SPIN), 11 the Self-Report Questionnaire (SRQ-20), 12 the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-BR), 13 the 21-item Brazilian version of the Game Addiction Scale (GAS), 6 and the suicidal ideation question (item 17) of the SRQ-20. Additional questions were designed to collect data on sociodemographic characteristics, gaming behavior, and perceived academic performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous research, cutoff points of IGD > 16 and IGD > 21 were adopted to identify moderate and high risk for IGD. 9 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be of interest for future research to use developmentally specific quality of life assessment tools for those over 18 years. It would also be fruitful to explore in future research other processes that favor the diagnostic accuracy of this scale, such as Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves (as demonstrated by Severo et al [68] and Monacis et al [62]), and other diagnostic elements, such as interviewing or complementary measures, should be used in the future in order to establish a robust clinically-driven gold standard diagnosis. Finally, according to the data obtained, the possible relationship between IGD and online gambling disorder with the advent of gambling-type elements in video games (e.g., loot boxes) should be noted for future lines of research to be explored.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Lines Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review [56] indicated the nine-item Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Sort Form (IGDS9-SF) [57] as the most reviewed and translated instrument to assess IGD based on the nine IGD criteria developed by the APA. In fact, since its publication, the IGDS9-SF has been translated into at least nine languages: Chinese [58], German [59], Czech [60], Slovenian [61], Italian [62], Persian [63], Turkish [64,65], Polish [66], European and South American Portuguese [67,68]. Therefore, it is a cross-culturally suitable psychometric tool to assess IGD that allows framing the problem uniformly and inter-culturally with adequate psychometric properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IGDS9-SF was originally developed in English and subsequently psychometrically validated and adapted to various languages, including Albanian [ 33 ], Chinese [ 34 ], Czech [ 35 ], German [ 36 ], Italian [ 37 ], Malay [ 38 ], Persian [ 31 ], Polish [ 39 ], European and South American Portuguese [ 15 , 40 ], Slovenian [ 41 ], Spanish [ 42 ], and Turkish [ 32 , 43 ]. Furthermore, its cross-cultural validity has been further supported by several international studies examining its measurement invariance (i.e., configural, metric, and scalar) across different countries [ 33 , 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%