Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the FACE-Q Scales for Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty

Klassen, Anne F.; Cano, Stefan; East, Charles; Baker, Stephen B.; Badia, Lydia; Schwitzer, Jonathan A.; Pusic, Andrea L.

doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2015.1445

Cited by 128 publications

(132 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

125

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…FACE‐Q has been rigorously developed, measuring both aesthetic satisfaction and the quality of life of patients . Klassen et al developed a specific module for rhinoplasty to assess the nasal pyramid and nasal wings . We have translated these questionnaires in accordance with international translation recommendations …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

French validation of the FACE‐Q Rhinoplasty module

Radulesco

Penicaud

Santini

et al. 2018

Clinical Otolaryngology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The aim of this study was to translate the FACE‐Q "Rhinoplasty" module into French and validate its use for the French‐speaking population. Design "Satisfaction with the nose" and "Satisfaction with nostrils" questionnaires were used and translated. Settings We were granted permission to use the FACE‐Q rhinoplasty module by the development team. These two questionnaires constitute the rhinoplasty module of the FACE‐Q questionnaire. ISPOR and WHO recommendations were used to complete the translation process from English into French in six steps. Main outcome measurement Our goal was to obtain, not a literal translation, but rather a translation of the idea or concept. Results Each step allowed us to make changes to achieve a conceptual translation equivalent to the original version. Conclusion The FACE‐Q questionnaire is a reference in the field of cosmetic surgery outcome evaluation. The use of two validated translation recommendations, with a six‐step translation‐back translation process, leads to a French version corresponding to the original. This version is usable in a French‐speaking population.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

French validation of the FACE‐Q Rhinoplasty module

Radulesco

Penicaud

Santini

et al. 2018

Clinical Otolaryngology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This study has previously described limitations [10, 13–16]. First, the sample was heterogeneous (e.g., varied by age, gender, timing of assessment), which limits the outcome findings we can report.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…The FACE-Q [10, 12–16] is a PRO instrument that includes 40 plus scales and checklists designed to measure appearance, adverse effects, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and experience of health care. These domains form the basis of the FACE-Q conceptual framework.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and Psychometric Validation of the FACE-Q Skin, Lips, and Facial Rhytids Appearance Scales and Adverse Effects Checklists for Cosmetic Procedures

Klassen

Cano²,

Schwitzer

et al. 2016

JAMA Dermatol

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Klassen et al. developed an interesting concept derived from the FACE‐Q questionnaire to create a module for use in rhinoplasty: The FACE‐Q rhinoplasty module (FQRM) . This scale is commonly used and has been validated in the literature, assessing patients’ satisfaction regarding their nose and nostrils.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%