Development and Pilot Test of the RAND Program Evaluation Toolkit for Countering Violent Extremism

Beaghley, Sina; Helmus, Todd C.; Matthews, Miriam; Ramchand, Rajeev; Stebbins, David; Kadlec, Amanda; Brown, Michael A.

doi:10.7249/rr1799

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 5 publications

(18 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A detailed description of how the toolkit was developed is available in the companion report (Beaghley et al, 2017).…”

Section: Overview Of Contentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

RAND Program Evaluation Toolkit for Countering Violent Extremism

Helmus¹,

Matthews²,

Ramchand³

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A detailed description of how the toolkit was developed is available in the companion report (Beaghley et al, 2017).…”

Section: Overview Of Contentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We also used the literature review to identify the types of evaluation approaches and measures that have been used elsewhere. More information about how the toolkit was developed can be found in a companion report (Beaghley et al, 2017). …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

RAND Program Evaluation Toolkit for Countering Violent Extremism

Helmus¹,

Matthews²,

Ramchand³

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Numerous publications and papers have been written about the general subject of ‘terrorism’ (itself a contested term – Schmid and Jongman, 1984) and counter-terrorism, particularly following the attacks of 9/11. 1 The counter-terrorism field has had some notable success in terms of evidence generation – albeit with a focus on interventions by governments (tending to be what might be described as ‘harder’ measures): for instance, the I-VEO Knowledge Matrix (National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, n.d.) and a recent review by Beaghley et al (2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Evaluation in an emerging field: Developing a measurement framework for the field of counter-violent-extremism

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite previous research, the field of counter-violent-extremism has not benefited significantly from evaluation. By comparison, and despite a number of challenges, the evidence-based healthcare movement has an established track record of using evaluation to develop practice. We seek lessons from the evidence-based healthcare movement about what it might take to develop evaluation capacity in the emerging field of counter-violent-extremism. Based on this, we offer a framework for measurement in counter-violent-extremism: the 'Violent Extremism Evaluation Measurement Framework'. We map out states and manifestations associated with violent extremism and radicalisation, then suggest how to measure levels and changes in relevant attributes.

show abstract

“…Despite the widespread use of such campaigns, research assessing the effects of CVE communication campaigns is still in its early phases (Beaghley et al, 2017). Such assessments are key to monitoring and evaluation (M&E) efforts, which help improve communications campaigns and ensure that resources go to campaigns that work.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Countering Violent Extremism in the Philippines: A Snapshot of Current Challenges and Responses

Rhoades¹,

Helmus²

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.

show abstract

Development and Pilot Test of the RAND Program Evaluation Toolkit for Countering Violent Extremism

Cited by 6 publications

References 5 publications

RAND Program Evaluation Toolkit for Countering Violent Extremism

RAND Program Evaluation Toolkit for Countering Violent Extremism

Evaluation in an emerging field: Developing a measurement framework for the field of counter-violent-extremism

Countering Violent Extremism in the Philippines: A Snapshot of Current Challenges and Responses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About