2010
DOI: 10.2174/1875038901003010001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Optimization of an Electrospraying Device for the Continuous Collection of Nano- and Microparticles~!2009-12-01~!2010-01-29~!2010-04-14~!

Abstract: Abstract:The development, fabrication and testing of a compact electrospray device are presented with the dual goal of increasing yields and total particle amounts by orders of magnitude and retaining the monodispersity of the generated polymeric particles. A new and optimized electrospraying device producing 285 mg/24h monodisperse micro-sized particles with a yield of 79.2% was developed and tested. The new design allowed continuous particle production and collection. By optimization of the chamber design, h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The collection efficiency can reach more than 90% in the optimized condition. In a different study, Grafahrend et al (2010) developed a new and optimized electrospraying device consisting of the basic electrospray configuration, a spraying chamber, and a cyclone-type particle collector that can continuously produce 11.875 mg.h −1 monodisperse micro-sized particles with a yield of 79.2% while a basic electrospraying device allowed collection of only 34.7% of the generated particles.…”
Section: Particle Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collection efficiency can reach more than 90% in the optimized condition. In a different study, Grafahrend et al (2010) developed a new and optimized electrospraying device consisting of the basic electrospray configuration, a spraying chamber, and a cyclone-type particle collector that can continuously produce 11.875 mg.h −1 monodisperse micro-sized particles with a yield of 79.2% while a basic electrospraying device allowed collection of only 34.7% of the generated particles.…”
Section: Particle Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has many advantages over other methods of atomization such as narrow particle size distribution under controlled behavior because of high charge and good dispersion because of surface charge [18] and the capability of controlling particle size and morphology by varying the processing parameters such as flow rate, [19] collecting distance [20] and needle gauge [21] and solution parameters. [22] The present study explored the application of EHDA technique to obtain microparticles of PLGA as an FDA-approved biocompatible polymer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the single cone-jet mode, the system produced particles with similar diameter and size distribution. Grafahrend et al 176 also developed a new electrospraying device for continuous production to increase both yield and total particle amounts without loss of monodispersity. Such a device with an optimized chamber design and high velocities in combination with reduced turbulence enabled an increase in collected particles of circa 14 times in 24 h compared to standard electrospraying configuration.…”
Section: Challenging and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%