2002
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0311:daiowg>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Implementation of Wind-Generated Ocean Surface Wave Modelsat NCEP*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
173
0
8

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 311 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
173
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…2) used in the ocean wave model was constructed from the General Bathymetric Chart of the Waves for Geophysical and Other Applications) (Stopa et al, 2016) global wave hindcast, conducted using WAVEWATCH-III wave model (Tolman et al, 2002). The wave hindcast was constructed using the winds from CFSR (Climate Forecast System 15 Reanalysis) dataset (Saha et al, 2014 …”
Section: Wave Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) used in the ocean wave model was constructed from the General Bathymetric Chart of the Waves for Geophysical and Other Applications) (Stopa et al, 2016) global wave hindcast, conducted using WAVEWATCH-III wave model (Tolman et al, 2002). The wave hindcast was constructed using the winds from CFSR (Climate Forecast System 15 Reanalysis) dataset (Saha et al, 2014 …”
Section: Wave Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, very little wave period and direction data are available in the SH, and consequently we rely on global wave models such as the ERA-40 reanalysis, and the corrected version produced by Sterl and Caires (2005). Another source is the operational global wave model NWW3 (Tolman et al, 2002). Sterl and Caires (2005) in September 1975, which signals a change in regime with higher H S observed after the dip than before.…”
Section: Variability and Trends Of Global Wave Model Estimated Wave Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While ERA-I includes wave data through a coupled model system, Chawla et al [2013] utilized CFSR surface winds to generate hindcast wave data with WAVEWATCH III of Tolman et al [2002]. showed ERA-I is more consistent through time, while CFSR better resolves the upper percentiles and variability in comparison to buoy and altimetry measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%