2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2010.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and evaluation of arterial incident detection models using fusion of simulated probe vehicle and loop detector data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the four neural network representations, the best neural network detected almost 93% of the incident observations in the training data with no false alarms. Dia and Thomas (2011) showed a detection rate of 86% and false alarm rate of 0.36%. Inclusion of speed data further improved performance, resulting in an incident detection rate of 90% and a false alarm rate of 0.5%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the four neural network representations, the best neural network detected almost 93% of the incident observations in the training data with no false alarms. Dia and Thomas (2011) showed a detection rate of 86% and false alarm rate of 0.36%. Inclusion of speed data further improved performance, resulting in an incident detection rate of 90% and a false alarm rate of 0.5%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This past research varies by the specific data utilized and the data analysis methodologies applied within the incident detection procedures. The methodologies applied include discriminant analysis (Sethi, Bhandari, Koppelman, & Schofer, 1995;Sermons & Koppelman, 1996), statistical algorithm (Cullip & Hall, 1997), neural network (Ivan, 1997;Dia & Thomas, 2011), Bayesian network (Zhang & Taylor, 2005), and regression model (Ahmed & Hawas, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dia and Thomas [14] devised a neural network algorithm that uses a fusion of data from loop detectors and probe vehicles identified by fixed devices. Larger advantages can be obtained, however, by collecting data directly from floating cars; that is, vehicles that move on the road network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…neural networks [9][10][11][12] or Kalman modelling [13], fusing additional data sources e.g. automatic license plate recognition [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%