2003
DOI: 10.1080/14616700306499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Effects of Finnish Press Subsidies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They argue that a main reason for this is that the existing subsidies typically attack variable costs rather than fixed costs. Consistent with this, Picard and Grönlund (2003) find that instead of promoting a variety of viewpoints, Finnish press subsidies have primarily benefited the press of the dominant political parties, thus resembling the results found for…”
Section: Empirical Analyses Of Direct Media Supportsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They argue that a main reason for this is that the existing subsidies typically attack variable costs rather than fixed costs. Consistent with this, Picard and Grönlund (2003) find that instead of promoting a variety of viewpoints, Finnish press subsidies have primarily benefited the press of the dominant political parties, thus resembling the results found for…”
Section: Empirical Analyses Of Direct Media Supportsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…It is customary to distinguish between direct and indirect media support (Picard and Grönlund, 2003). In contrast to direct aid, indirect aid does not enter as observable items in a firm's financial statement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases it was justified by the need for additional state revenuesalthough the actual tax revenue in retrospect never reached the projected levels. At the same time, Finland stands out as the country where the financial arguments dominate the political rhetoric over cultural concerns and the Finnish public support for news media has been in steady decline since the 1990s (Picard and Grönlund 2003). Sweden and Norway in particular, having stronger public finances, have more clearly justified their political decisions based on arguments of media pluralism and cross-media harmonisation.…”
Section: The Financial Argumentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Experience has shown that balanced interventions are vital as such measures could also threaten diversity and stimulate further concentration trends. Research into the various forms of press assistance and their levels of efficacy has shown that there is only a limited correlation between the accepted arguments for giving press assistance and the actual consequences of such assistance (see Charon, 1994;Picard, 1985Picard, , 1987Picard and Grönlund, 2003).…”
Section: A Search For Alternate Forms Of Press Subsidymentioning
confidence: 99%