Development and content validation of the Electronic Instrumental activities of daily living Satisfaction Assessment (EISA) outcome tool

Quamar, Abbas H.; Schmeler, Mark R.; Collins, Diane; Schein, Richard M.

doi:10.1080/10400435.2021.1953192

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The EISA assesses satisfaction with the following 10 IADL domains: transportation; finances; shopping; health and wellness; nutrition; communication; household and security management; memory, planning, and organization; leisure; and education and employment (see the Appendix ; Quamar et al., 2021 ). Although memory, planning, and organization are not conventional IADL domains, they were included in the EISA scale, because they are vital for completing IADLs with an iCAD ( Quamar et al., 2020 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The EISA scale items were developed from a literature review that assessed the common functional tasks that PWDs complete using an iCAD ( Quamar et al., 2021 ). The review identified 111 different tasks that could be grouped along the management of 10 IADL domains on the basis of existing self-report IADL measures: (1) transportation, (2) finances, (3) health, (4) meals, (5) shopping, (6) communication, (7) household or emergency, (8) education or employment, (9) memory, planning, and organization, and (10) leisure.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Test–Retest Reliability of the Electronic Instrumental activities of daily living Satisfaction Assessment (EISA): A Cohort Study

Quamar,

Schmeler,

McCue

et al. 2023

The American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Importance: Currently, no self-report instruments exist for assessing satisfaction with performing instrumental activities of daily living and occupations for people with disabilities using internet-connected assistive devices like accessible smartphones, tablets, laptops, and apps. Objective: To assess the test–retest reliability and internal consistency of the Electronic Instrumental activities of daily living Satisfaction Assessment (EISA) self-report outcome tool. Design: Repeated-measures cohort study with a time frame of 7 to 21 days. Setting: Multicity online recruitment at assistive technology clinics, nongovernmental organizations, advocacy and peer support groups for people with disabilities, and higher education institutions. Participants: Eighty-four participants with disabilities, age 18 yr or older, with a mean age of 43.3 yr (range = 19–75 yr), and 57% female. Intervention: Not applicable. Outcomes and Measures: The a priori study hypotheses were that the EISA test–retest reliability scores would be above the minimum acceptable level (Rs > .80) and that internal consistency would be good (Cronbach’s α = .70–.90). Results: On the basis of the study data, the EISA, Version 1.0, demonstrated good test–retest reliability (Rs = .81) and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .88). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of the test–retest reliability and internal consistency analyses provide good support for the EISA to be used in clinical settings. What This Article Adds: This article documents the reliability and internal consistency of, to our knowledge, the first-ever self-report instrument for assessing satisfaction with performance of everyday occupations for people with disabilities using internet-connected assistive devices such as smartphones, tablets, laptops, and apps.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%