“…Indeed, some studies report a very low success rate in screening for sex markers, as in Populus, where none of the 1,219 markers tested were linked to sex (McLetchie and Tuskan 1994); in A. officinalis, with only one marker linked to sex of the 760 markers tested (0.13%, Jiang and Sink 1997); or in S. viminalis, where two markers linked to sex of the 953 markers tested (0.21%, Alstrom-Rapaport et al 1998 andGunter et al 2003), which correspond to one sex-linked band over 1,080 scored bands (0.09%, Alstrom-Rapaport et al 1998). On the other hand, a high rate of success was reported in white campion (four over 60 markers tested, 7%, Mulcahy et al 1992), A. deliciosa (eight over 34 markers tested, 23.5%; corresponding to eight over 430 bands scrored, 1.9%; Shirkot et al 2002), palmyrah (B. flabellifer, three over 180 markers tested, 1.7%; George et al 2007), P. fascicularis (one over 89 markers tested, 1.1%, corresponding to one over 813 bands scored, 0.1%; Vinod et al 2007), and G. biloba (one over 48 markers tested, 2.1%; Liao et al 2009). Interestingly, the three species with a low rate of success in screening sex markers show single dominant locus, two locus epistatic system, or incipient sex chromosome gender determination mechanisms, whereas heteromorphic X ⁄ Y sex chromosomes are encountered in white campion (Vyskot and Hobza 2004).…”