2020
DOI: 10.3390/v12060627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Application of Performance Assessment Criteria for Next-Generation Sequencing-Based HIV Drug Resistance Assays

Abstract: Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) assays outperform conventional Sanger sequencing in scalability, sensitivity, and quantitative detection of minority resistance variants. Thus far, HIVDR assays have been applied primarily in research but rarely in clinical settings. One main obstacle is the lack of standardized validation and performance evaluation systems that allow regulatory agencies to benchmark and accredit new assays for clinical use. By revisiting the existing principle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, slight variations that affected precision were noted at relative abundances below 20%, but more prominent at 1%. This could be attributed to the sequence error rate of ~ 1% and the increased likelihood of cross-contamination and sampling/PCR biases [ 19 ]. Although, minority mutations at frequencies < 0.5% could result in treatment failure [ 20 ], the clinical relevance of variants below 5% is still a question of debate [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, slight variations that affected precision were noted at relative abundances below 20%, but more prominent at 1%. This could be attributed to the sequence error rate of ~ 1% and the increased likelihood of cross-contamination and sampling/PCR biases [ 19 ]. Although, minority mutations at frequencies < 0.5% could result in treatment failure [ 20 ], the clinical relevance of variants below 5% is still a question of debate [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were then tested for AIVs using a matrix (M) gene-specific real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) method according to the WHO guideline for animal influenza virus detection [ 16 ]. Continuously, the samples containing influenza A virus were examined for HPAIV and clade detection based on an RT-qPCR assay following a previous report [ 17 ]. Positive AIV samples were isolated by inoculating 10-day-old embryonated chicken eggs in a biosafety level two plus facility at the College of Veterinary Medicine, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, Vietnam.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and specificity assessment of NGS HIV-DRT pose different challenges, compared to SS HIV-DRT, because of the quantitative nature and higher sensitivity of such assays [24]. NGS HIV-DRT is privileged to have the capacity to detect MRVs in the viral population.…”
Section: Ngs Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%