2020 Ninth International Conference of Educational Innovation Through Technology (EITT) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/eitt50754.2020.00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Application of Information Literacy Assessment Tool for Primary and Secondary School Teachers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the framework for teacher information literacy standards, a comprehensive evaluation index for teachers’ information literacy was proposed in our previous study (Zhou et al , 2020). The framework evaluates information literacy among primary and secondary school teachers on the five dimensions of information awareness, knowledge, application and ethics and security and professional engagement; these dimensions include 13 second-level indicators and 38 third-level indicators, as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the framework for teacher information literacy standards, a comprehensive evaluation index for teachers’ information literacy was proposed in our previous study (Zhou et al , 2020). The framework evaluates information literacy among primary and secondary school teachers on the five dimensions of information awareness, knowledge, application and ethics and security and professional engagement; these dimensions include 13 second-level indicators and 38 third-level indicators, as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An information literacy evaluation instrument (questionnaire) was also developed for primary and secondary school teachers. The scientific quality and rationality of this instrument were tested by analyzing its reliability, validity, difficulty and differentiation through a presurvey with 1668 primary and secondary school teachers (Zhou et al , 2020). In this study, difficulty coefficient P was 0.68, and discrimination degree D was 0.45, which indicated that the questionnaire has moderate difficulty and good discrimination.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In evaluating information literacy, typical standards and frameworks have been documented (ACRL, 2015; IEA, 2013; ILFA, 2006; SCONUL Working Group on Information Literacy, 2011; UNESCO, 2013). However, many scholars have expanded and constructed special information literacy evaluation indicators for various fields and objects (Niemelä et al , 2012; Zhou et al , 2020), which according to Li et al (2021) provide satisfactory support for the precise evaluation of information literacy in different scenarios. Regarding the methods of evaluating information literacy, most scholars use only self-designed questionnaires that consist of self-assessments with closed-ended test questions (Pinto et al , 2019).…”
Section: Humanities Graduate Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%