2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10815-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating technology into teaching: Factors influencing rural teachers’ innovative behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Teachers' information literacy is a comprehensive quality that demonstrates that they purposefully and reasonably use digital resources in teaching and learning. In a more practical sphere, the organizational environment, peer support, and information literacy have positive impacts on teachers' innovative behaviors, while excessive technostress, as Wu et al (2022) also argue, will hinder teachers' IWB. However, there is evidence from this study and previous ones (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Teachers' information literacy is a comprehensive quality that demonstrates that they purposefully and reasonably use digital resources in teaching and learning. In a more practical sphere, the organizational environment, peer support, and information literacy have positive impacts on teachers' innovative behaviors, while excessive technostress, as Wu et al (2022) also argue, will hinder teachers' IWB. However, there is evidence from this study and previous ones (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Research considers knowledge and the desire to learn (Chou et al. , 2019; Wu et al. , 2022), perceived ease of use (Nair and Das, 2012), attitudes towards digital tools (Jogezai et al.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Business, computer science, economics, and sociology are just a few of the domains in which knowledge sharing and knowledge transfer have been extensively investigated. Even though many people have talked about knowledge sharing in organizations ( Srivastava et al, 2006 ; Tohidinia and Mosakhani, 2010 ; Tangaraja and Rasdi, 2013 ; Wu et al, 2022 ), few studies have looked into how employees hide their knowledge ( Peng, 2013 ; Černe et al, 2014 ; Ahmad and Akbar, 2021 ; Chatterjee et al, 2021 ; Mahmoud et al, 2021 ; Waheed et al, 2021 ). Although more emphasis is being paid to the “knowledge sharing” behaviors of workers in various working contexts, limited information is available about academics’ “knowledge hiding” activities in the academic environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%