2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and application of a visual loop-mediated isothermal amplification combined with lateral flow dipstick (LAMP-LFD) method for rapid detection of Salmonella strains in food samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recombinase polymerase amplification could amplify target fragments in a shorter time (10 min). By contrast, a longer time (40 min) is required for a Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay, and approximately 40 cycles (40 min) are required in the qPCR assay [1,13,28]. Clearly, the RPA assay is more efficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recombinase polymerase amplification could amplify target fragments in a shorter time (10 min). By contrast, a longer time (40 min) is required for a Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay, and approximately 40 cycles (40 min) are required in the qPCR assay [1,13,28]. Clearly, the RPA assay is more efficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several LFAs compatible with LAMP have been developed to allow for the detection of foodborne pathogens in various food matrices, including meats, produce, milk, and seafood. [95][96][97][98] A number of studies have attempted to integrate the LFA with more PON sample processing steps. 99,100 For example, the Kim group utilized a cellulose nitrate filter to concentrate and isolate E. coli in beef samples before downstream LAMP and LFA detection.…”
Section: Paper-based Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous reports published only a single LFB assay for the detection of either Campylobacter or Salmonella spp. in food [37][38][39], as it is challenging to enrich both microorganisms simultaneously, due to the fact that their growth requirements on different selective broths as well as slower growth of Campylobacter under microaerobic conditions [40]. However, as previously described [41], both organisms contaminated in food were enriched independently and were then gathered for DNA extraction.…”
Section: And S1 Table) As Well As In Allmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the analytical sensitivity of our d-LAMP-LFB assay in spiking study was also comparable to the LFB in other previous studies. It has been reported that the lowest inoculated detection limit for Salmonella targeting invA gene was 8×10 3 CFU/25 g (320 CFU/g) after enrichment for 18-24 h [37], 36 CFU/25 g (1.44 CFU/g) targeting hilA gene after 6 of enrichment [38], while C. jejuni was 10 1 −10 2 CFU/ 25 g (or 10 1 −10 2 CFU/mL of initial inoculum levels) targeting hipO gene without enrichment step [39]. Several qPCR kits such as BAX 1 Campylobacter coli/jejuni/lari assay (DuPont Qualicon), BAX 1 Salmonella assay (Hygiena), BIOTECON foodproof 1 Campylobacter Detection Kit (Biotecon Diagnostics) and BIOTECON foodproof 1 Salmonella Detection Kit (Biotecon Diagnostics) are commercially available with the level of detection as low as 1-10 CFU/25 g sample or 10 3 −10 4 CFU/mL after 20-24 h and 24-48 h of enrichment for Salmonella and Campylobacter, respectively.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%