2014
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02200-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Application of a Multiplex PCR Method for Rapid Differential Detection of Subgroup A, B, and J Avian Leukosis Viruses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mPCR method is based on a single PCR method. Therefore, although this method has the advantages of simple operation, time savings, and low cost, there are inherent weaknesses of sensitivity due to the amount of competitive inhibition between the amplicons, which renders the sensitivity of the mPCR lower than that of single PCR [1,4,16]. Therefore, our expectation of the mPCR effect was that when the viral titer of each virus in the sample exceeded the sensitivity of the mPCR method, all viruses would be detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mPCR method is based on a single PCR method. Therefore, although this method has the advantages of simple operation, time savings, and low cost, there are inherent weaknesses of sensitivity due to the amount of competitive inhibition between the amplicons, which renders the sensitivity of the mPCR lower than that of single PCR [1,4,16]. Therefore, our expectation of the mPCR effect was that when the viral titer of each virus in the sample exceeded the sensitivity of the mPCR method, all viruses would be detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiplex PCR (mPCR) method is based on a single PCR that can simultaneously detect a variety of pathogens and simplify the operation steps, thereby saving time and expense [3]. Recently, mPCR has been widely used in the field of pathogen detection because it has advantages of speed, specificity and efficiency [1,4,16]. In this study, an mPCR method was established and applied for the detection of CPV-2, CAV and CCoV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 We also detected other viruses using PCRs specific for avian reovirus (ARV), avian leukosis virus (ALV), Marek's disease virus (MDV), reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV), CAV and avian adenovirus (ADV). 10, 11, 12 All positive PCR products were sequenced for verification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR that used to detect other pathogens including MDV (F: 5 0 -T GCGATGAAAGTGCTATGGAGG-3 0 ; R: 5 0 -GAGAATCCCTATGAGAAAGCGC-3 0 ), AGV2 (F: 5 0 -CGTGTCCGCCAGCAGAAAC-3 0 ; R: 5 0 -GGTAGAAGCCAAAGCGTCCAC-3 0 ) [9], ALV (F: 5 0 -GGATGAGGTGACTAAGAAAG-3 0 ; R: 5 0 -CGAACCAAAGGTAACAC ACG-3 0 ) [21], REV (F: 5 0 -GCCTTAGCCGCCATTGTA-3 0 ; R: 5 0 -CCAGCCAACACC ACGAACA-3 0 ) [22] and ARV (F: 5 0 -ATGGCGGGTCTCAATCCATC-3 0 ; R: 5 0 -TTA GGTGTCGATGCCGGTAC-3 0 ) [23].…”
Section: Amplification Of the Cav Genomementioning
confidence: 99%