Current Methods in Historical Semantics 2011
DOI: 10.1515/9783110252903.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing The Historical Thesaurus of the OED

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The construction of these domains has been derived carefully from lexicographical data and gradually refined over a period of 40 years. For details of domain classification, see work by the lexicographers of the HTE (p xviii-xx, Kay, Roberts, Samuels, & Wotherspoon, 2009).…”
Section: Historical Dataset Of Metaphorical Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction of these domains has been derived carefully from lexicographical data and gradually refined over a period of 40 years. For details of domain classification, see work by the lexicographers of the HTE (p xviii-xx, Kay, Roberts, Samuels, & Wotherspoon, 2009).…”
Section: Historical Dataset Of Metaphorical Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I found, for example, that although Wmatrix automatically assigned all instances of politely to the politeness semtag, S1.2.4+, it was used in one context in a question that sought to suggest 'the covert nature of the art of pick-pocketing' (Archer, The need for historical sensitivity to meaning-in-context has recently been addressed more comprehensively via the Semantic Annotation and Mark Up for Enhancing Lexical Searches (SAMUELS) project (amongst others). 9 As part of SAMUELS, the 232 semantic categories within Wmatrix have been mapped to 4,033 themed categories derived from the Historical Thesaurus of the Oxford English Dictionary (Kay et al, 2009). This means that researchers can now (better) discover, quantitatively speaking, which words/phrases were used to perform a particular pragmatic or discursive function (such as discourtesy and verbal aggression) throughout the ages (see, e.g., Wattam et al, 2014;Archer and Malory, 2017).…”
Section: Recontextualising Decontextualised Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other categories should be added to this ontology to make it more apt for the history domain so to include, for example, events of cognition, emotion and communication. The USAS (Rayson et al 2004) and the Historical Thesaurus of English tagsets (Kay et al 2009) contain twenty-one and thirty-seven main semantic categories, respectively and they have been already used to analyse historical texts (Archer 2014;Rayson et al 2015): For this reason, they can provide an interesting fine-grain classification of events for the history domain. Factuality, i.e., the distinction between actual real facts and imaginary, future, avoided and prevented events, has a limited interest for historians, whilst it is more relevant from a linguistic perspective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%