1999
DOI: 10.1080/00223989909599760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Team Cohesion: A Comparison of Cognitive-Behavioral Strategies of U.S. and Australian Sport Coaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have revealed that parental behavior, coaching practices, and coach-athlete compatibility significantly impact the child's behavioral and emotional responses to organized sport participation (Rosenfeld et al, 1989;Scanlan and Lewthwaite, 1989;Black and Weiss, 1992). Positive coaching behaviors typically include performance-based encouragement, individualized instruction, active listening, and development of team cohesion (Ryska et al, 1997). Passer (1982) suggests that when supportive coaching behaviors such as these are largely absent within the competitive setting, considerable anxiety may be manifested in the young athlete.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several studies have revealed that parental behavior, coaching practices, and coach-athlete compatibility significantly impact the child's behavioral and emotional responses to organized sport participation (Rosenfeld et al, 1989;Scanlan and Lewthwaite, 1989;Black and Weiss, 1992). Positive coaching behaviors typically include performance-based encouragement, individualized instruction, active listening, and development of team cohesion (Ryska et al, 1997). Passer (1982) suggests that when supportive coaching behaviors such as these are largely absent within the competitive setting, considerable anxiety may be manifested in the young athlete.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Likewise, from a youth athlete's perspective, sport participants identified the "lack of cliques" as an actual indication of a team's level of social cohesion (Eys, Loughead, Bray, & Carron, 2009). From a team-building perspective, one qualitative investigation asked coaches to provide strategies for facilitating team cohesion (Ryska, Yin, Cooley, & Ginn, 1999). A theme that emerged was the 'breaking-up of cliques,' and coaches highlighted the importance of promoting a sense of social acceptance (vs. clique development and isolation) among team members.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the important association between cohesion and team performance, sport psychologists and team managers seek team-building techniques that effectively and consistently produce changes in cohesion (e.g., Crace & Hardy, 1997). Suggested team-building interventions include developing shared goals, accepting individual differences, learning personal information, establishing a similar attitude across team members, and promoting communication (Carron, 1980;Eys et al, 2010;Martin, Carron, & Burke, 2009;Prapavessis & Carron, 1997;Ryska, Yin, Cooley, & Ginn, 1999;Turman, 2003). Moreover, team-building techniques are perceived by many managers and coaches to be an integral part of a team's development (Bloom, Stevens, & Wickwire, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%