2009
DOI: 10.1080/13601440903106551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
130
0
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
13
130
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…At its best a learning environment provides a shared control for developing scientific competence . For example, the experience of belonging to a scholarly community has been shown to be the key to a successful PhD process, promote engagement in learning and well-being (Austin, 2010;Gardner, 2010;Golde, 2000;Pyhältö, Stubb, & Lonka, 2009). However there is also evidence that working in a research group does not guarantee an experience of a membership (Pyhältö et al, 2009;Walsh, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At its best a learning environment provides a shared control for developing scientific competence . For example, the experience of belonging to a scholarly community has been shown to be the key to a successful PhD process, promote engagement in learning and well-being (Austin, 2010;Gardner, 2010;Golde, 2000;Pyhältö, Stubb, & Lonka, 2009). However there is also evidence that working in a research group does not guarantee an experience of a membership (Pyhältö et al, 2009;Walsh, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, although not clearly articulated by the participants, the importance of meaningfully organising students' learning experiences, conditions, environment, and curricula so that they are inherently engaging cannot be over-emphasised (e.g., Gardner, 2007;Gardner and Barnes, 2007;Hoskias and Goldberg, 2005;Pyhalto, Stubb, and Lonka, 2009;Vekkaila, Pyhalto and Lonka, 2013a). This includes creating possibilities for interaction with faculty and the scholarly community, involvement in undergraduate teaching and research projects mainly for students from regional universities, and providing space (a room/office at least in groups) so that supervisors are in close proximity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In meaningfully organised doctoral learning environments, students are likely to receive feedback and support from supervisors (e.g., Ives and Rowley, 2005;Hoskins and Goldberg, 2005), cherish opportunities to interact with faculty and the scholarly community (e.g., Gardner, 2007;Gardner and Barnes, 2007;Hoskias and Goldberg, 2005;Pyhalto, Stubb, and Lonka, 2009;Vekkaila, Pyhalto, and Lonka, 2013a) and experience free and periodic discussion about issues surrounding teaching and learning (Hoskias and Goldberg, 2005). Doctoral students also participate in undergraduate teaching and research projects (e.g., Gardner, 2007;Gardner and Barnes, 2007;Hoskias and Goldberg, 2005;Pyhalto, Stubb, and Lonka, 2009;Vekkaila, Pyhalto, and Lonka, 2013a). Meaningfully structured learning environments generally promote higher motivation levels, and immersion in doctoral activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that instead of following core phases, doctoral students conceptualise their doctoral research process on the immediate scholarly environment in which they are situated (Gardner, 2007;Pyhältö, Stubb, & Lonka, 2009;Stubb et al, 2011). In this way, students will look for and adopt views and practices they perceive to be useful (Sweitzer, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%