2017
DOI: 10.2471/blt.16.179531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing global indicators for quality of maternal and newborn care: a feasibility assessment

Abstract: ObjectiveTo assess the feasibility of applying the World Health Organization’s proposed 15 indicators of quality of care for maternal and newborn health at health-facility level in low- and middle-income settings.MethodsSix of the indicators are about maternal health, five are for newborn health and four are general cross-cutting indicators. We used data collected routinely in facility registers and obtained as part of facility assessments from 963 health-care facilities specializing in maternity services in 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
40
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is essential that partners prioritise alignment of quality of care assessment tools. The recent development and testing by WHO and partners of a core set of harmonized maternal newborn and child health indicators is a step in the right direction, but the final indicators need to be rapidly integrated into existing tools [ 4 ]. In addition, as with any new tool developed by international agencies, it is imperative that the standards on which the tools are based are accepted by healthcare workers and established in the local context as realistic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is essential that partners prioritise alignment of quality of care assessment tools. The recent development and testing by WHO and partners of a core set of harmonized maternal newborn and child health indicators is a step in the right direction, but the final indicators need to be rapidly integrated into existing tools [ 4 ]. In addition, as with any new tool developed by international agencies, it is imperative that the standards on which the tools are based are accepted by healthcare workers and established in the local context as realistic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaders of global health agencies have agreed an agenda for better measurement of the quality of healthcare and aim to align the various efforts, reduce the burden of data collection and reporting for countries and improve linkage of results with decision-making. New tools for the assessment of quality have been developed and international consensus reached on indicators for quality of care in maternal, newborn and child health [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, maternal blood pressure (BP) is easily measured even in remote settings. It is considered as an indicator of quality antenatal care (1) and useful in predicting hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs), preterm-birth and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants (2). In addition to systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), both mean arterial pressure (MAP), and pulse pressure (PP) (3) also have clinical value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to continue the progress made in reducing maternal, child and neonatal mortality, the global community has recognized that in going forward with the SDGs there needs to be a focus on quality of care measurement [ 5 ]. For this purpose, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed and released a list of global indicators for maternal and newborn care in 2014, one of which is the “proportion of newborns who received all four elements of essential care”, which are as follows: immediate and thorough drying, immediate skin-to-skin contact, delayed cord clamping and initiation of breast feeding within the first hour [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%