Developing Decision Making Grid for Maintenance Policy Making Based on Estimated Range of Overall Equipment Effectiveness

Shahin, Arash; Attarpour, Mohammad Reza

doi:10.5539/mas.v5n6p86

Cited by 15 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 34 publications

(39 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The more frequent objectives associated with equipment criticality assessment found in the literature are: -Maintenance strategy selection; -Preventive maintenance (PM) tasks scheduling; -Identification of equipment that should receive greater attention by maintenance. Methods based on equipment criticality for maintenance strategy selection were proposed by Bevilacqua and Braglia [14], Fernandez et al [1], Labib [15], Shahin and Attarpour [16] and Stadnicka et al [7]. Labib [15] proposed a model to be linked to a computerized maintenance management system to support decision making.…”

Section: Literature Review 31 Criticality Assessment Purposementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Shahin and Attarpour [16] modified the decision making grid presented by Labib [15] to include the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) indicator. The authors presented two solutions: a decision-making grid that considers the indicators Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) and Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) and another decision making grid where MTBF was replaced by OEE.…”

Section: Literature Review 31 Criticality Assessment Purposementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The methods proposed by Khanlari et al [6], Li and Ni [18] and Saleh et al [19] aim at support PM scheduling. Khanlari et al [6] as in [16] use MTBF and MTTR indicators to define criticality, as well as availability of resources to perform the preventive task, the work load and operation sensitivity. In short, the criteria considered in the criticality assessment method in addition to assess equipment performance and maintenance results through two indicators, also assess the possibility of carrying out the task at the considered time and the impact of a possible equipment failure.…”

Section: Literature Review 31 Criticality Assessment Purposementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Criticality evaluation to support maintenance management of manufacturing systems

Lopes¹,

Figueiredo²,

Sá³

2020

Int J Ind Eng Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper focuses on criticality evaluation for supporting daily equipment maintenance management and the definition of medium and long-term maintenance actions to improve equipment and, therefore, productivity. These two different purposes led to the development of two different methods for criticality evaluation, using criteria adjusted for each case. The first method is based on rules for defining priorities for corrective and preventive maintenance tasks. Since a failure mode of critical equipment is not necessarily critical, priorities for maintenance tasks are assigned to tasks rather than to equipment. The second method uses Analytic Hierarchy Process to prioritize equipment based on its performance. This method is based on the indicators commonly monitored by maintenance departments. In addition to assessing equipment performance, it considers the maintenance effort made to achieve the evaluated performance. The selection of the criticality criteria and the development of the methods was based on literature review and triggered by a case study in a multinational automotive company. With the integration of the proposed methods in a computerized maintenance management system, maintenance technicians and managers are able to know in real time the tasks that should be performed first and to monitor the overall performance of equipment in the plant, focusing improvements where they are more required.

show abstract

Section: Literature Review 31 Criticality Assessment Purposementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Review 31 Criticality Assessment Purposementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Review 31 Criticality Assessment Purposementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Criticality evaluation to support maintenance management of manufacturing systems

Lopes¹,

Figueiredo²,

Sá³

2020

Int J Ind Eng Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…• Group A -Made up of 9 articles (BOZICKOVIC;MARIC,2013;BRANDT;THUN, 2010;CHOWDHURY,2014;CLOSS;SPEIER;MEACHAM;MEACHAM, 2011;FURLAN;DAL PONT;VINELLI, 2011;KISPERSKA-MORON;HAAN, 2011;NAOR;LINDERMAN;SCHROEDER, 2010;GARBIE, 2011;SHAHIN;ATTARPOUR, 2011), which are isolated and address issues isolated from other works identified.…”

Section: Independent Journal Of Management and Production (Ijmandp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Network Analysis on Lean Production and World Class Manufacturing: how are associated in the literature?

Goes

Satolo

Queiroz

et al. 2017

Ind. Jour. Manag. & Prod.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to conduct a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to identify how to configure the publications that relate WCM and Lean Production issues. Therefore, a search on the Brazilian metasearch portal called CAPES Periodicals was conducted focusing on articles of the last five years. They were identified after screening and filtering a total of 42 articles, which were analyzed. The construction of the network analysis has identified that the issues are still in an initial phase of association, with the characteristic part of decentralizes networks, with some points of greatest association. It was also identified that the theme Lean Production has greater representation between the two topics due its higher use by authors.

show abstract

“…OEE is mostly used in one of the policies, i.e. total productive maintenance and it helps in decision making (Shahin, 2011) to improve the overall performance of organizations.…”

Section: Oee Metricsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maintenance Performance Metrics for Manufacturing Industry

Kumar¹,

Soni²,

Agnihotri³

2013

IJRET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate various maintenance performance indicators (MPIs) within the perspective of maintenance metrics conducted by the managerial personnel for achieving the specified production target. In this paper, a conceptual framework has been developed, that provides guideline for choosing maintenance performance metrics for a typical manufacturing industry. It seeks to align maintenance objective with the performance indicators and provides a link between the two. Operations and maintenance of manufacturing system are of great economic importance. The review of literature on maintenance performance indicators and their measurement has been summarized under the five categories of metrics; functional metrics, equipment performance metrics, maintenance process metrics, periodicity metrics and OEE metrics. The review indicates that quantitative metrics for measuring maintenance performance are lacking. To address this gap, maintenance performance metrics has been proposed.

show abstract

Developing Decision Making Grid for Maintenance Policy Making Based on Estimated Range of Overall Equipment Effectiveness

Cited by 15 publications

References 34 publications

Criticality evaluation to support maintenance management of manufacturing systems

Criticality evaluation to support maintenance management of manufacturing systems

Social Network Analysis on Lean Production and World Class Manufacturing: how are associated in the literature?

Maintenance Performance Metrics for Manufacturing Industry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About