2014
DOI: 10.1177/1053451214560892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Concepts and Generalizations to Build Algebraic Thinking

Abstract: Many students with learning disabilities (LD) in mathematics receive their mathematics education in general education inclusive classes; therefore, these students must be capable of learning algebraic concepts, including developing algebraic thinking abilities, that are part of the general education curriculum. To help students develop algebraic thinking, teachers should ask questions in different ways to promote the ability to think algebraically. This article describes three types of questions—reversibility,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students with persistent mathematics difficulties benefit from learning mathematics more deeply through instruction that includes three types of questions—reversibility, flexibility, and generalization—that are important for intensive instruction (Dougherty, Bryant, Bryant, Darrough, & Pfannenstiel; see Table 1 for examples). Reversibility questions give students the answer and then they create the question.…”
Section: Types Of Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students with persistent mathematics difficulties benefit from learning mathematics more deeply through instruction that includes three types of questions—reversibility, flexibility, and generalization—that are important for intensive instruction (Dougherty, Bryant, Bryant, Darrough, & Pfannenstiel; see Table 1 for examples). Reversibility questions give students the answer and then they create the question.…”
Section: Types Of Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, fewer literature has been found related to reversible reasoning investigations in conceptual relationships for inverse function problems. The focus of previous researchers are more on the operational aspects, for example by identifying error reversals that students make for the problem of "students and professors" (González-Calero, Arnau, & Laserna-Belenguer, 2015;Soneira, González-Calero, & Arnau, 2018;Tunç-Pekkan, 2015), reversible multiplication relationships (Hackenberg, 2010), cognitive conflict and insufficient mental processes to reverse problem situations (Ramful, 2014), the type of task that causes reversible reasoning (B. Dougherty, Bryant, Bryant, & Shin, 2017;B. J. Dougherty, Bryant, Bryant, Darrough, & Pfannenstiel, 2015;Sangwin & Jones, 2017;Simon, Kara, et al, 2016;Vilkomir & O'Donoghue, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These areas were chosen because of their foundational importance to algebra and because they were not well represented in the existing procedural measures. Within each domain, items were created using three processes identified by Krutetskii (1976), a Russian psychologist, and adapted by the Curriculum Research & Development Group (Rachlin, 1998) and others (Dougherty, Bryant, Bryant, Darrough, & Pfannenstielf, 2015).…”
Section: Cbm In Secondary Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We drew upon these question types as we developed items for the conceptual measures (c.f., Dougherty et al, 2015). We classified items as representing generalization, flexibility, and reversibility.…”
Section: Cbm In Secondary Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%