Developing clinical leaders: the impact of an action learning mentoring programme for advanced practice nurses

Abstract

Mentoring can assist nurses to transition to new roles and develop knowledge and skills in clinical leadership essential for advanced practice roles. Nurse managers should make greater use of mentoring programmes to support nurses in their transition to new roles.

A utilização de instrumentos para avaliação da liderança nos serviços de saúde e enfermagem

“…Hence, instruments or tools, whose development is based on different leadership theories/models/styles, can be applied to evaluate leadership. The most abundant theoretical framework in the investigated manuscripts was transformational leadership: more than half the papers addressed this model (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(56)(57)(58) , which corroborates other studies (59)(60)(61)(62) . Transformational leadership is wide, visionary and charismatic, characteristics that made it one of the most popular in the present days.…”

“…The styles/models/theories of leadership found in the selected materials were: transformational leadership (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(56)(57)(58) , cited in 20 papers; transactional leadership (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37) , in 11 papers; situational leadership (41)(42)(49)(50) , in four papers; servant leadership (45)(46)48) , in three papers; authentic leadership (51)(52)(53)(54)(55) , in five papers; quantum leadership (38) , in one paper; charismatic leadership (39) , in one paper; and clinical leadership (25,44) , in two papers. Three studies did not mention a specific style/model/theory …”

“…in general, four with nurses and nursing technicians and a few described investigations with a mix of nurses and other professionals. Nineteen instruments were identified to evaluate leadership: Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ) (five papers) (51)(52)(53)(54)(55) ; Charismatic Leadership Socialized Scale (one paper) (39) ; Clinical Leadership Survey (CLS) (one paper) (25) ; the Coaching tool (two papers) (41)(42) ; Scale of attitudes toward leadership styles (one paper) (33) ; the 360º tool (one paper) (40) ; Global Transformational Leadership Scale (three papers) (56)(57)(58) ; Grid Gerencial (one paper) (43) ; Leadership Effectiveness and Adaptability Description (LEAD) (two papers) (49)(50) ; LMX-Leader-member Exchange (two papers) (46)(47) ; Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI) (six papers) (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) ; Leadership Reward and Punishment Behavior Questionnaire (LRPQ) (one paper) (33) ; Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) (eleven papers) (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37) ; Multisource Feedback Tool (MSF) (one paper) (44) ; the Quantum tool (one paper) (38) ; Servant Leadership Questionnaire (SLQ) (one paper) (48) ; Servant Leadership Survey (SLS) (two papers) …”

“…Other instruments that stood out in the transformational category were the Global Transformational Leadership Scale (56)(57)(58) , TLI (33) , STL (31) , LPI (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) and Scale of attitudes toward leadership styles (33) .…”

Equipping clinical leaders for system and service improvements in quality and safety: an Australian experience

“…The LPI has been used in a large number of studies related to health professional leadership. 23,24 This scale has 30 items and given the Cronbach's alpha of 0.958, all items were included in the analysis. This scale contains five subscales, four of which had acceptable Cronbach's alphas: Challenging the process (0.832), Inspiring a shared vision (0.900), Modelling the way (0.847), and Encouraging the heart (0.898).…”