2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-018-0251-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and validating a scale for evaluating internship-related learning outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing studies evaluating students' internship experience tend to focus on different aspects or dimensions of students' internship experience. Some focus on evaluating students' perceived learning outcomes from their WIL experience (Gilbert, Banks, Houser, Rhodes, & Lees, 2014; Nghia & Duyen, 2018; Parks, Onwuegbuzie, & Cash, 2001), while others focus on evaluating students' perception of the learning environment such as their perception of clear goals, feedback in the workplace, and support from the university (Courtney‐Pratt, Fitzgerald, Ford, Johnson, & Wills, 2014; Smith, 2012). Even among studies which evaluated students' perceived learning outcomes from internship, they tend to focus on different types of learning outcomes (Inceoglu, Selenko, McDowall, & Schlachter, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing studies evaluating students' internship experience tend to focus on different aspects or dimensions of students' internship experience. Some focus on evaluating students' perceived learning outcomes from their WIL experience (Gilbert, Banks, Houser, Rhodes, & Lees, 2014; Nghia & Duyen, 2018; Parks, Onwuegbuzie, & Cash, 2001), while others focus on evaluating students' perception of the learning environment such as their perception of clear goals, feedback in the workplace, and support from the university (Courtney‐Pratt, Fitzgerald, Ford, Johnson, & Wills, 2014; Smith, 2012). Even among studies which evaluated students' perceived learning outcomes from internship, they tend to focus on different types of learning outcomes (Inceoglu, Selenko, McDowall, & Schlachter, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the evaluation instrument developed by Smith, more validated instruments evaluating students' WIL experience have emerged in recent years, with some designed for evaluating students' perception of the internship learning environment (Courtney‐Pratt et al, 2014) and others designed solely for evaluating students' perception of learning outcomes from their internship experience (Nghia & Duyen, 2018; Parks et al, 2001). However, given that these instruments were developed in different contexts, their relevance to the context of engineering internship experience is uncertain.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjectivity of WIL assessment is further complicated by the involvement of multiple stakeholders. For example, hospitality students who enrol in a WIL placement are normally evaluated by their employers at the end of their internship (Nghia and Duyen 2019). In many cases, these professional partners have limited training in providing constructive and formative feedback to assist student learning (Lasen et al 2018).…”
Section: Authentic Assessment and Wilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Industry professionals play a significant role in assisting student to bridge the gaps between theory and practice (Nghia and Duyen 2019). This interaction encourages contextualisation of learning and assists students to transform industry perspectives into intended EL outcomes through completing the assessments.…”
Section: Theme 3: Industry Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…experience by helping students develop relevant professional skills and soft skills, connect with professionals, and acclimate to the world of work (Nghia & Duyen, 2019).…”
Section: Sense Of Belongings Student's Engagement and Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%