2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and validating a scale to measure Food and Nutrition Literacy (FNLIT) in elementary school children in Iran

Abstract: Background

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
133
2
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
133
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when taking into consideration these two dimensions, the SEM demonstrated that they were poorly explained by those items. This is in contrast with what found in one scale developed for children from elementary schools which measured the cognitive domain (understanding and knowledge) and the skill domain (functional, food choice, interactive, and critical skills) with 6 subscales and confirmed the validity of this structure [23]. Instead, in our study, a 4-factor model was fairly consistent with our data, this being confirmed by acceptable values of absolute fit indices (relative χ 2 , RMSEA, and SRMR) and incremental and parsimony fit indices (CFI, AIC, and BIC); even though an initial 5-factor model of the FL scale was proposed, confirmatory analysis showed that four domains encompassing weight/food/health, food/environment, traditional foods, and food groups/meals were explained by the selected items ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, when taking into consideration these two dimensions, the SEM demonstrated that they were poorly explained by those items. This is in contrast with what found in one scale developed for children from elementary schools which measured the cognitive domain (understanding and knowledge) and the skill domain (functional, food choice, interactive, and critical skills) with 6 subscales and confirmed the validity of this structure [23]. Instead, in our study, a 4-factor model was fairly consistent with our data, this being confirmed by acceptable values of absolute fit indices (relative χ 2 , RMSEA, and SRMR) and incremental and parsimony fit indices (CFI, AIC, and BIC); even though an initial 5-factor model of the FL scale was proposed, confirmatory analysis showed that four domains encompassing weight/food/health, food/environment, traditional foods, and food groups/meals were explained by the selected items ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…It is intuitive that children in preschool age have not still developed the basic skills such as reading and writing, and at higher extent they cannot even be able to use health information to gain greater control over life events and situations. This implies that the authors of the present investigation have not applied this construct to the developed scale, in contrast with other studies addressed to scholars or adult/older people that were based on this hierarchical construct to measure validity of the scale for the assessment of FL [23,49,50]. The developed instrument, therefore, does not actually capture all aspects potentially relevant for the multifaceted concept of FL, but the authors believe that the chosen and analyzed items can cover all the possible knowledge and skills that can be reachable in the age range 3-6 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, specific areas of health literacy, including food literacy and nutrition literacy, have been proposed and conceptualized. Studies that assessed the relationship between two concepts suggested a wide multifaceted topic that can be called food and nutrition literacy (FNLIT) [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%