Developing and testing the patient-centred innovation questionnaire for hospital nurses

Huang, Ching‐Yuan; Weng, Rhay‐Hung; Wu, Tsung‐Chin; Lin, Tzu-En; Hsu, Ching-Tai; Hung, Chiu-Hsia; Tsai, Yu-Chen

doi:10.1111/jonm.12539

Cited by 10 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic scoping review dimensions related to all of the concepts of patient engagement. 27,30,36,37 Furthermore, we found that no tool simultaneously assesses the core dimensions of the partnership in care presented in our conceptual framework (individualized care, empathy, interpersonal trust, communication, experiential knowledge and self-care). 7 Tools assessing preferences regarding patient engagement in care are relatively scarce.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%

“…We categorized the dimensions assessed in each tool into the main concepts of engagement, which include patient centredness, empowerment and shared decision‐making. The results reveal that the two main concepts evaluated in the included scales are shared decision‐making (81%, n = 13) 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 and patient centredness (75%, n = 12), 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 36 , 37 , 38 while empowerment is present in 50% ( n = 8) of the included tools. 27 , 28 , 30 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The results reveal that the two main concepts evaluated in the included scales are shared decision‐making (81%, n = 13) 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 and patient centredness (75%, n = 12), 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 36 , 37 , 38 while empowerment is present in 50% ( n = 8) of the included tools. 27 , 28 , 30 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(n = 8) of the included tools. 27,28,30,[33][34][35][36][37] Nine tools evaluate two concepts simultaneously. [24][25][26]28,29,31,34,35,38 Of these, six evaluate (37%) both patient-centredness and shared decision-making.…”

Section: Concepts and Dimensions Assessed With The Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…and shared decision-making). 27,30,36,37 Three of them, and the most recently developed, have involved patients in their tool development or validation. 27,36,37 Involving patients in the development and validation of tools that assess the quality of care can contribute to uncovering complementary aspects of quality that are not necessarily CLAVEL ET AL.…”

Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience

Clavel

Paquette

Dumez

et al. 2021

Health Expectations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Patient engagement in care is a priority and a key component of clinical practice. Different approaches to care have been introduced to foster patient engagement. There is a lack of a recent review on tools for assessing the main concepts and dimensions related to patient engagement in care.Objective: Our scoping review sought to map and summarize recently validated tools for assessing various concepts and dimensions of patient engagement in care.Search Strategy: A scoping review of recent peer-reviewed articles describing tools that assess preferences in and experience with patient engagement in care was conducted in four databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL-EBSCO). We adopted a broad definition based on the main concepts of patient engagement in care: patient-centredness, empowerment, shared decision-making and partnership in care.Main Results: Of 2161 articles found, 16, each describing a different tool, were included and analysed. Shared decision-making and patient-centredness are the two main concepts evaluated, often simultaneously in most of the tools. Only four scales measure patient-centredness, empowerment and shared decision-making at the same time, but no tool measures the core dimensions of partnership in care. Most of the tools did not include patients in their development or validation or just consulted them during the validation phase. Discussion and Conclusion:There is no tool coconstructed with patients from development to validation, which can be used to assess the main concepts and dimensions of patient engagement in care at the same time.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%