The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a value-centred proposal for assessing project success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
55
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The interpretation of project success, failure and challenge was left to the discretion of the respondent, as this is still being debated with several opposing views [Turner, 2004;Yu, Flett & Bowers, 2005;Agarwal & Rathod, 2006;Wang & Huang, 2006;Jha & Iyer, 2007;Shepherd, Covin & Kuratko, in press]. …”
Section: Ict Project Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpretation of project success, failure and challenge was left to the discretion of the respondent, as this is still being debated with several opposing views [Turner, 2004;Yu, Flett & Bowers, 2005;Agarwal & Rathod, 2006;Wang & Huang, 2006;Jha & Iyer, 2007;Shepherd, Covin & Kuratko, in press]. …”
Section: Ict Project Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, CIATs were commonly used, but new evaluation methods and techniques have now been developed. More advanced financial analysis options have been recommended in the literature (Yu et al, 2005;Patton and Shechet, 2007;Liesiö et al, 2007;Peffers and Dos Santos, 2013), while other authors (Renkema and Berghout, 1997;Irani and Love, 2008;Milis and Mercken, 2004;Bernroider et al, 2013) have presented inclusive lists of investment appraisal approaches used in justifying capital investment in IS. These include a number of common ex-ante evaluation methods (Love et al, 2005), which are listed in Table 3.…”
Section: It/is Investment Project Selection Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No obstante, este modelo ha sido criticado por algunos investigadores, ya que puede llevar a una evaluación incorrecta del proyecto al centrarse solo en el nivel operativo del mismo (Shenhar et al, 2001;Yu, Flett, & Bowers, 2005) y no refleja las necesidades y requerimientos de los interesados clave, por lo que otros estudios (Asad & Pinnington, 2014;Atkinson, 1991;Lim & Mohamed, 1999;Pinto & Mantel, 1990;Pinto & Pinto, 1991;Shenhar et al, 1997) sugieren agregar nuevas dimensiones.…”
Section: Marco Teórico Eficiencia De Proyectosunclassified
“…Por otra parte, algunos estudios recomiendan reducir los factores de costo, calidad y tiempo a dos, ya que se considera una medida excesiva creer que el tiempo debe ser una variable en función del costo, debido a que, para cierta calidad, debe existir una relación entre el costo y el tiempo (Yu et al, 2005).…”
Section: Marco Teórico Eficiencia De Proyectosunclassified