Abstract:Generically-validated guidelines may not be sufficiently discriminatory for specialized areas of practice such as intrapartum fetal monitoring.
“…Most previous studies using the AGREE instrument have focused on the quality of guidelines at national level (eg, 11–13 ), and few have evaluated the quality of local guidelines using this instrument 14. Others evaluating the quality of local guidelines have used methods of documentary analysis15 or have used non-standard quality appraisal tools 1617…”
We believe this to be the first systematic appraisal of the quality of local NHS guidelines. Overall these local guidelines were of poor quality. It is not clear whether the quality of these midwifery guidelines is typical of local guidelines in other clinical areas, but this study raises fundamental questions about the appropriate development of high-quality local clinical guidelines.
“…Most previous studies using the AGREE instrument have focused on the quality of guidelines at national level (eg, 11–13 ), and few have evaluated the quality of local guidelines using this instrument 14. Others evaluating the quality of local guidelines have used methods of documentary analysis15 or have used non-standard quality appraisal tools 1617…”
We believe this to be the first systematic appraisal of the quality of local NHS guidelines. Overall these local guidelines were of poor quality. It is not clear whether the quality of these midwifery guidelines is typical of local guidelines in other clinical areas, but this study raises fundamental questions about the appropriate development of high-quality local clinical guidelines.
“…The full 3‐year study entailed two parts. Part one involved a quality appraisal of all regional guidelines on EFM 10 using a specifically developed tool 11 . Part two involved surveys of childbearing women and interviews with midwives.…”
Over the last 20 years in the United Kingdom, midwives have implemented the routine use of intrapartum fetal monitoring regardless of the risk status of laboring women. This practice is at odds with the published research. The discrepancy between practice and best evidence merits further investigation. A qualitative study was conducted to evaluate midwives' attitudes and experiences about the use of fetal monitoring for women at low obstetric risk. Fifty-eight midwives working in two hospitals in the north of England were interviewed by using a semistructured approach. The taped interviews were transcribed and analyzed by using a general thematic approach. Issues included midwives' perceptions of low-risk status, the socialization of midwives, and the loss of woman-centered care. Midwives subscribed to the notion of woman-centered care, but because of a complexity of factors experienced in their daily working lives, they felt vulnerable when attempting to implement evidence-based fetal monitoring practices. Midwives regretted the loss of a woman-centered approach to care when technologic methods of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring were used indiscriminately. An appreciation of the complex factors affecting the ability of midwives to implement evidence-based practice is important when attempting to facilitate the development of appropriate fetal monitoring practices for women at low obstetric risk.
This review is published as a Cochrane Review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, 2. Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews should be consulted for the most recent version of the Review.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.