2008
DOI: 10.1080/19322900802205817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a Standardized List of Questions for the Usability Testing of an Academic Library Web Site

Abstract: Modern academic libraries have a great number of information resources available online in the form of electronic catalogs, books, journals, and subject subscription databases. To determine whether users can easily retrieve the information they are seeking, academic librarians conduct usability testing of their libraries' Web sites. There has been an emergence of publications focusing on the usability testing of academic library Web sites. However, researchers frequently report problems and limitations related… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes asking what a database was, what a catalog was, and if a link for the catalog's “guided search” was the same as an advanced search. Letnikova (2008) has noted that this confusion is quite quite common in various usability studies at the University of Southern California, Hunter College, University of Illinois Chicago, and the University of Mississippi Libraries. Also, these users commented on how the site was accessible, well organized, minimalistic, and easy to use.…”
Section: Second Usability Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes asking what a database was, what a catalog was, and if a link for the catalog's “guided search” was the same as an advanced search. Letnikova (2008) has noted that this confusion is quite quite common in various usability studies at the University of Southern California, Hunter College, University of Illinois Chicago, and the University of Mississippi Libraries. Also, these users commented on how the site was accessible, well organized, minimalistic, and easy to use.…”
Section: Second Usability Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before releasing the first version of the translation system in December 2009, a series of tests were carried out in order to check its effectiveness in handling formats and the user interface's usability. To do so, we followed some of the ideas introduced in [10] and [11]. This section briefly outlines the design and the results obtained in both tests, performed by nine people from the university staff who volunteered to evaluate system quality for different formats and the usability of the interface.…”
Section: Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Modules of the Apertium machine translation system• more than 22 language pairs have been released10 and many others have been started or are in development, • the engine has been improved to deal with less related languages (thanks to the three pass transfer) and to be Unicode compliant • file format support has been extended to all Office formats, Quark-Xpress, special XML-based formats, etc., • support for translation memories has been enabled (still experimental), • language variants, polysemic or specific domain management has also been enabled, • applications and tools have been developed for Apertium, such as Tinylex 11 , a version of the bilingual dictionaries for mobile devices; apertium-subtitles, a tool for translating subtitles; user interfaces or add-ons for Firefox, and • research on social MT development based on Apertium is currently being developed as part of a project entitled Tradubi…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Letnikova [8] 1 This article has been peer reviewed. 2 Corresponding author (e-mail: mrlemieu@ucalgary.ca) question sets used by academic libraries to find ways to improve the accuracy of usability testing by suggesting a list of standardized questions, noting that careful attention needs to be given to indications that show that the participants understand the tasks.…”
Section: Task List Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%