2012
DOI: 10.3390/s121014158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a Reading Concentration Monitoring System by Applying an Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm to E-Books in an Intelligent Classroom

Abstract: A growing number of educational studies apply sensors to improve student learning in real classroom settings. However, how can sensors be integrated into classrooms to help instructors find out students' reading concentration rates and thus better increase learning effectiveness? The aim of the current study was to develop a reading concentration monitoring system for use with e-books in an intelligent classroom and to help instructors find out the students' reading concentration rates. The proposed system use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many human behaviors, including head pose tracking (Ba & Odobez, 2009, 2011, face tracking (Stiefelhagen et al, 2002) and eye gaze tracking, are used in developing AAS (Toet, 2006). However, with advances in the assessment of human physiological signals, e-learning research has increasingly used physiological signals to determine students' attention levels (Chen & Huang, 2014;Hsu et al, 2012). Related efforts in recent years have assessed learners' emotions by using human physiological signals, such as heart rate variability (HRV) and EEG (Chen & Sun, 2012;Chen & Wang, 2011) and attention (Chen & Lin, 2014;Rebolledo-Mendez et al, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many human behaviors, including head pose tracking (Ba & Odobez, 2009, 2011, face tracking (Stiefelhagen et al, 2002) and eye gaze tracking, are used in developing AAS (Toet, 2006). However, with advances in the assessment of human physiological signals, e-learning research has increasingly used physiological signals to determine students' attention levels (Chen & Huang, 2014;Hsu et al, 2012). Related efforts in recent years have assessed learners' emotions by using human physiological signals, such as heart rate variability (HRV) and EEG (Chen & Sun, 2012;Chen & Wang, 2011) and attention (Chen & Lin, 2014;Rebolledo-Mendez et al, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the change of human-computer interaction between computers and users from traditional keyboard and mouse control to image-based interface and sensory control, experts and researchers in all fields attach great importance to user experience issues. (Jetter & Gerken, 2006;Mahlke, 2005) The products, system or service developed by the designer need to improve the content of the interface and enhance user's experience by observing the feedback provided by users after interacting with the product through the steps of user's experience satisfaction (Hsu et al, 2012;Su et al, 2014). In particular, the development of emerging technologies being applied to the field of education is even more necessary to understand the mastery of science and technology and the usefulness of the system through the experience of users.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hsu, Chen, Su, Huang, and Huang (2012) stated that attention is the ability to focus on or sustain an action without interference from external stimuli. The most widely accepted theory about attention in general is the feature-integration theory (Treisman & Gelade, 1980).…”
Section: Literature Review Attention and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Cullen, Dan, Rogers, and Fisk (2014) measured how undergraduate students allocated their visual attention in an automated multiple-task environment. Hsu et al (2012) measured reading concentration, which refers to the attention focused on reading or learning, in terms of how actively a student pays attention to the learning materials and contents during the learning process. Moreover, if the time-on-task decreases, then the number of distractors would increase (Halperin, 1996), with Baloian et al (2008) noting the disruptions to attention caused by the use of input devices such as a keyboard and mouse while instructors use an electronic blackboard.…”
Section: Measurement Of Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%