Developing a professional identity in a new work environment: the views of defendant intermediaries working in the criminal courts

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to find out how intermediaries interpret their role working with vulnerable defendants at court. Design/methodology/approach – In this study six intermediaries who have worked with defendants were interviewed using a semi-structured interview and the interview transcripts were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Findings – Intermediaries appeared to be trying to make sense of their developing identities as professionals in the courtroom and this theme is conceptualised through social identity complexity theory. Practical implications – Health and care professionals undertaking a new function in the criminal justice sector should receive training about the psychological processes underlying developing professional identities. Such training should reduce the cognitive load when they work in the new environment and failure to undertake this training may lead to less efficient practice. Gaining an understanding of their professional positioning within the court environment may assist with retention of intermediaries in this new role. Originality/value – This is the first published study where intermediaries have been interviewed about their experiences with defendants. Recommendations are made including the requirement for additional training for intermediaries to understand the underlying psychological processes and conflicts they may experience when working with defendant cases.

‘It’s really good…why hasn’t it happened earlier?’ Professionals’ perspectives on the benefits of communication assistance in the New Zealand youth justice system

“…The results of these pilot evaluations aside, Cooper and Mattison (2017) have highlighted the distinct lack of research into the intermediary role within the respective jurisdictions. Only a handful of studies have taken place to date (Collins, Harker, & Antonopoulos, 2017; Henderson, 2015; Henry et al., 2017; O’Mahony, 2009; O’Mahony, Creaton, Smith, & Milne, 2016; O’Mahony, Milne, & Smith, 2018; Powell, Bowden, & Mattison, 2015).…”

‘I am not beholden to anyone… I consider myself to be an officer of the court’: A comparison of the intermediary role in England and Wales and Northern Ireland

“…These publications provide insights which are crucial to understanding how the role operates, from the police station to the courtroom, and how it has become integrated into the criminal justice process. O’Mahony et al’s (2016) research is also important in understanding the sorts of practical challenges encountered by intermediaries in their work and how the role could be better utilised. The operation of the ‘two tier’ intermediary system in England and Wales has been the subject of more recent academic critique with Hoyano and Rafferty (2017: 97) lamenting the ‘inequality of arms’ between witnesses and defendants in terms of intermediary access.…”

Investigative interviewing, dissociative identity disorder and the role of the Registered Intermediary

“…There is an emerging body of research examining the role of the intermediary which has included a case study approach examining interview transcripts where the vulnerable adult has a learning disability (O'Mahony, 2012). The views of defendant intermediaries working in the criminal courts have also been documented (O'Mahony, Creaton, Smith and Milne, 2016). In addition, there has been research examining mock juror perceptions of the intermediary role in child witness cases (Ridley, van Rheede and Wilcock, 2015;Collins, Harker and Antonopoulos, 2016).…”