2013
DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2013.782567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a new hybrid MCDM method for selection of the optimal alternative of mechanical longitudinal ventilation of tunnel pollutants during automobile accidents

Abstract: Breathable air inside the tunnel is an undeniable necessity and beside natural ventilation, the tunnel should be reliably organized, to automatically provide healthy air under different conditions. Among methods of tunnel ventilation, longitudinal and transverse modes are the most common mechanical methods. This research is focused on selection of the optimal method for mechanical longitudinal ventilation of tunnel pollutants from four presented models. In terms of this research, the authors used SWARA (Step-w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3, presented the VIKOR papers addressed within Construction Management based on author (s) and year, technique and approach, type of study, application area and scope and study purpose. Peng [115] combined VIKOR, TOPSIS, ELECTRE III, GRA, PROMETHEE II, and weighted sum model (WSM) for assessment of earthquake vulnerability, Zolfani et al [116] combined the VIKOR and SWARA for selection of mechanical longitudinal ventilation of tunnel pollutants, Ginevičius et al [117] combined the VIKOR and TOPSIS for assessment of alternatives of wall insulation, Zavadskas and Antuchevičiene [118] integrated the VIKOR and TOPSIS for ranking of building redevelopment, Mela et al [119] integrated VIKOR with weighted product method, TOPSIS and PROMETHEE II, weighted sum method for evaluation of building design, Pamučar andĆirović [120] presented new model based on DEMATEL-Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) for decision assessment on the acquisition of manipulative transport. Ebrahimnejad et al [121], integrated a modified ANP with the VIKOR for selection construction project.…”
Section: Construction Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3, presented the VIKOR papers addressed within Construction Management based on author (s) and year, technique and approach, type of study, application area and scope and study purpose. Peng [115] combined VIKOR, TOPSIS, ELECTRE III, GRA, PROMETHEE II, and weighted sum model (WSM) for assessment of earthquake vulnerability, Zolfani et al [116] combined the VIKOR and SWARA for selection of mechanical longitudinal ventilation of tunnel pollutants, Ginevičius et al [117] combined the VIKOR and TOPSIS for assessment of alternatives of wall insulation, Zavadskas and Antuchevičiene [118] integrated the VIKOR and TOPSIS for ranking of building redevelopment, Mela et al [119] integrated VIKOR with weighted product method, TOPSIS and PROMETHEE II, weighted sum method for evaluation of building design, Pamučar andĆirović [120] presented new model based on DEMATEL-Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) for decision assessment on the acquisition of manipulative transport. Ebrahimnejad et al [121], integrated a modified ANP with the VIKOR for selection construction project.…”
Section: Construction Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Öncelikle SWARA yönteminin basitliği farklı uzmanların aynı anda bir amaç uğruna çalışabilmesini kolaylaştırmaktadır. Bu ise araştırmacıların zamandan tasarruf edebilmelerini sağlayabilmektedir [26]. AHP ve ANP gibi yöntemlerden farklı olarak ölçütler değerlendirilmeksizin veya sıralanmaksızın işletmelerin ya da ülkelerin önceliklerine göre derecelendirme işlemi gerçekleştirilebilmekte ve uzmanların fikirleri dikkate alındığından SWARA yöntemi daha öznel değerlendirmeler için kullanılabilmektedir [49].…”
Section: Kavramsal Ve Metodoloji̇k çErçeve (Conceptual and Methodologiunclassified
“…To solve the inherent uncertainty and imprecision of the MCDM, a fuzzy assessment approach was introduced, combining the concept of entropy and interval normalization procedure in a fuzzy AHP (Ozkir and Demirel, 2012). Zolfani et al (2013) combined stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis and weighted aggregated sum product assessment methods to solve the MCDM problem. The technical analysis results in the theoretical foundations of different MCDM methods and advantages and weaknesses among them were more fully shown by Larichev and Olson (2001), Belton and Stewart (2002), Hashemkhani et al (2013) and Figueira et al (2005).…”
Section: Multiple Criteria Decision-making (Mcdm)mentioning
confidence: 99%